Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4707 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2023
O.S.A.No.52 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.04.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
O.S.A.No.52 of 2015
and
C.M.P.No.2474 of 2017
M/s.Nathan Foundation (P) Ltd.,
Represented by its Managing Director,
K.V.Sankaralingam,
No.18, Arulambal Street,
T.Nagar,
Chennai – 17. ... Appellant
Vs.
1.A.Balasubramaniyam
2.Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Sampath
No.11, Second Street,
Jagathambal Colony,
Royapettah,
Chennai – 14. ... Respondents
Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original
Side Rules against the order dated 14.12.2012 in O.P.No.779 of 2006 on the
file of this Court.
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
O.S.A.No.52 of 2015
For Appellant : Mr.S.Balasubramaniam, Advocate
proposed to file vakalat for appellant
For R1 : Mr.P.Siddarth
for M/s.BFS Legal
R2 : No more
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by S.S. SUNDAR, J.)
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo earlier to the
effect that he has withdrawn the vakalat in the appeal for the appellant. The
learned counsel also submitted before this Court that he had duly informed
the appellant about the withdrawal of his vakalat. The counsel requested the
Court on that day that notice may be sent to the appellant. This Court
directed the Registry to print the name of the appellant in the cause list, as
the counsel for the appellant had no instructions and has also informed the
appellant about his withdrawal of vakalat.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.No.52 of 2015
2.Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” with the
name of the appellant being printed in the cause list. Today, another counsel
by name Mr.S.Balasubramaniam representing the appellant appeared before
this Court and submitted that he is going to file vakalat for the appellant.
The appellant, who has taken the papers long time back from the then
counsel, has no explanation to offer to this Court for not engaging a counsel
so far. It is also seen that the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution
even on an earlier occasion on 12.01.2017 and thereafter, restored vide
order of Court dated 16.07.2018. We do not find any valuable reason for
adjourning this matter further. Hence, this Court finds that the appeal is
liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (P.B.B., J.) 24.04.2023 mkn
Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.S.A.No.52 of 2015
S.S. SUNDAR, J.
and P.B. BALAJI, J.
mkn
O.S.A.No.52 of 2015
24.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!