Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr.K.Mangudithangaraj vs Mrs. Thirumalsamy Shanthi
2023 Latest Caselaw 4399 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4399 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2023

Madras High Court
Mr.K.Mangudithangaraj vs Mrs. Thirumalsamy Shanthi on 18 April, 2023
                                                                            C.S.No.379 of 2020

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 18.04.2023

                                                     CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

                                                C.S.No.379 of 2020

               Mr.K.Mangudithangaraj,
               Trading as Poonam Enterprises,
               No.921, High Block,
               1st Main Road, TNHB Nagar,
               Velacherry, Chennai – 600 042.                                    ...Plaintiff


                                                        Vs.

               1. Mrs. Thirumalsamy Shanthi,
                  Trading as Punithan Food Products,
                  1, Kovalan Nagar,
                   6th Cross Street, Pallikarnai,
                   Chennai -600 100.

               2. Mr.Karnan,
                  No.3, Kovalan Nagar,
                  6th Street, Pallikaranai,
                  Chennai – 600 100.                                       ... Defendants

               PRAYER: This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules, 1956
               read with           Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 read with
               Sections 27, 28, 29, 134 and 135 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 read with

               1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               C.S.No.379 of 2020

               Sections 51, 55, 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 2(1) (c ) (xvii)
               and 7 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015; praying to pass the judgment and
               decree:-


                         a. for a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their men,
               agents, servants or any one claiming through them from in any manner
               infringing the Plaintiff's registered trademark label POONAM registered
               under No.959991 in class 29 as plaint document No.1 hereto by using the
               offending trademark label which is identical or deceptively similar to or a
               colourable imitation of the Plaintiff's registered trademark or by using any
               other mark, label or device which is identical or deceptively similar or a
               colourable imitation of the Plaintiff's registered trademark;


                         b. for a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their men,
               agents, servants or any one claiming through them from in any manner
               passing off their goods as that of the Plaintiff's by using the offending
               trademark “PUNITHAM” or any other device or label or trade dress which is
               identical or deceptively similar to that of the Plaintiff's trademark label and
               trade dress POONAM, either by manufacturing or offering for sale of the
               products under the offending trademark label and trade dress or in any
               manner advertising the products under the offending trademark, trade dress
               and artistic work;




               2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  C.S.No.379 of 2020

                         c. for a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their men,
               agents, servants or any one claiming through them from in any manner
               infringing the Plaintiff's copyright over the artistic work in the trade mark
               label POONAM by using the offending trade mark label or trade dressor any
               other trade mark label or trade dress, which is identical or substantial
               reproduction of the Plaintiff's artistic work in the trade mark label and trade
               dress POONAM;


                         d. Directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff damages a sum of
               Rupees 25,00,000 for the illegal use of the plaintiff's trademark.


                         e. Directing the Defendant to render true and faithful accounts of the
               profits earned by them through the sale of offending trademark PUNITHAM
               and directing payment of such profits of the plaintiff;


                         f. Directing the defendants to surrender the offending trademark label
               PUNITHAM;
                         g. Directing the Defendants to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff;


                         h. Granting such further or other relief as this Court may deem fit and
               proper in the circumstances of the case.




               3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             C.S.No.379 of 2020



                                     For Plaintiff      : No appearance
                                     For Respondent     : Mr.V.Vivek
                                                     JUDGMENT

It is seen from the records that on 28.03.2023, the learned Master

ordered this suit to be listed before this Court, due to non cooperation of the

plaintiff for completing the service on the second respondent/defendant.

2. When the matter was listed before this Court on 11.04.2023, there

was no representation for the plaintiff . In order to give an opportunity to the

plaintiff, the Registry was directed to list the matter today (18.04.2023) under

the caption “for dismissal”. Even today (18.04.2023) there is no

representation for the plaintiff. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. No

costs.

18.04.2023

nti

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.379 of 2020

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

nti

C.S.No.379 of 2020

18.04.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter