Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S. Chandra vs The Commissioner
2022 Latest Caselaw 17025 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17025 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2022

Madras High Court
S. Chandra vs The Commissioner on 31 October, 2022
                                                                                     Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    Dated: 31/10/2022

                                                        CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                               Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014
                                                           and
                                                M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014

                     S. Chandra                             ...         Petitioner

                                                            Vs

                     1. The Commissioner
                        Municipal Administration
                        Local Administration Ministry
                        Fort St. George
                        Chennai 600 005.

                     2. The District Collector
                        Cuddalore District.

                     3. The Municipal Commissioner
                        Chidambaram Municipality
                        Cuddalore District.

                     4. The Sub-Registrar
                        Sub-Registrar Office
                        Chidambaram
                        Cuddalore District.

                     5. K. Kannapiran

                     6. N. Hariharanaganathan               ...         Respondents

                     Page No:1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014




                     PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying

                     for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the impugned

                     order of the third respondent dated 7/2/2014 bearing Pe.Mam.No.20/2014/A2

                     and quash the same.



                                   For petitioner           ...   Mr.S.A.Shanmugam

                                   For respondents         ...    Mr.D.Gopal
                                                                  Government Advocate
                                                                  for R.R.1 and 2.

                                                                  Mr.V.Kasinathabharathi
                                                                  for R.3.

                                                                  Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan
                                                                  Government Advocate
                                                                  for R.4.

                                                                  Mr.M.Prabhakar
                                                                  for R.5.

                                                                  Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan
                                                                  Senior Counsel
                                                                  for Ms.A.l.Ganthimathi
                                                                  for R.6.
                                                         -----




                     Page No:2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                              Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014


                                                               ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to quash the order of the third

respondent, dated 7/2/2014.

2. The facts of the case in a nutshell are as follows:-

The petitioner inherited the house site measuring 2401 Sq.feet bearing

Town Survey No.859, Block No.9, situated at 10/3 Angalamman Koil Street,

Chidambaram from his mother, by way of a registered Settlement Deed, dated

9/1/1991 and 6/2/1991. Thereafter, muted all the revenue records, viz., property

tax, water tax, electricity connection, etc. On 6/7/2005, fifth respondent had

created a false document and executed the sale in favour of the sixth

respondent. Despite the representations, dated 3/10/2013 and 30/12/2013,

given by the petitioner, before the third and second respondent, respectively,

document has been registered. To quash the same, the petitioner has come

forward with the instant writ petition.

3. Heard Mr.S.A.Shanmugam, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Mr.D.Gopal, learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2,

Page No:3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014

Mr.V.Kasinathabharathi, learned counsel for R.3, Mr.K.Tippu Sultan, learned

Government Advocate for the fourth respondent, Mr.M.Prabhakar, learned

counsel for the fifth respondent and Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, learned Senior

Counsel for the sixth respondent.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in

spite of his detailed representations, seeking not to transfer the property in

favour of sixth respondent, third respondent has passed the impugned order,

dated 7/2/2013, without conducting any enquiry.

5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the sixth respondent

submitted that they are the purchaser of the property and only based on the tile,

Proceeding has been passed. He further submitted that Civil Suit is pending in

S.A.No.59 of 2014.

6. Perused the materials available on record.

7. The very writ petition itself is filed with regard to the title and the

same has been seized by the Civil Court and now culminated into Second

Page No:4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014

Appeal, this Court is of the view that since the civil right is involved, title is also

disputed by each of the parties, same should be decided by the Civil Court.

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Rights of the parties

depend upon the judgment of the Civil Court. No costs. Consequently, the

connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

31/10/2022

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order

mvs.

Page No:5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.7912 of 2014

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J

mvs.

To

1. The Commissioner Municipal Administration Local Administration Ministry Fort St. George Chennai 600 005.

2. The District Collector Cuddalore District.

3. The Municipal Commissioner Chidambaram Municipality Cuddalore District.

4. The Sub-Registrar Sub-Registrar Office Chidambaram Cuddalore District.

W.P.No.7912 of 2014

31/10/2022

Page No:6/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter