Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16882 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.10.2022
CORAM :
CORAM : JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6258 of 2022
Muthupandi ... Petitioner/Accused-2
Vs.
1.The State rep.by
The Sub Inspector of Police,
Alwarkurichi Police Station,
Tenkasi District.
(Crime No.53/2020) .. Respondent/Complainant
2.Pitchammal .. Respondent/Defacto complainant
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in
C.C.No.227 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram
and quash the same with respect to the petitioner.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Anandha Rajagopal
For R1 : Mr.R.Sivakumar
Government Advocate (Crl.side)
For R2 : No Appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the proceedings in
C.C.No.227 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram
in respect of the Petitioner is concerned.
2.The main contention of the Petitioner is to be treated as alibi. It
cannot be considered by this Court in exercising its inherent
power/extraordinary power under Section 482 of Code of Criminal
Procedure.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) vehemently opposed
the line of the argument of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. What are
all submitted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner are to be treated as
alibi, that has to be considered only by the learned trial Judge at the time of
trial and appreciation of evidence and not by this Court exercising its
extraordinary power/inherent power under Section 482 of Code of Criminal
Procedure.
4.Whether the Petitioner was member of the Flying Squad, whether
the Petitioner available in the alleged place of occurrence, whether the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
occurrence took place as stated in the FIR, are all to be gone into by the
learned trial Judge and not by this Court, particularly, offence of this nature.
5.The learned Counsel for the Petitioner as well as the learned
Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted their arguments on 18.10.2022.
The case was posted today i.e.,27.10.2022 only to verify whether the
Second Respondent engaged the Counsel. Eventhough notice has been sent
to the Second Respondent, no one appeared for the second respondent.
6.In the light of the above and the vehement objection made by the
learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is
dismissed. When pronouncing the order, the learned Counsel for the
Petitioner sought exemption from personal appearance. The learned Trial
Judge is directed to pass appropriate order, if any petition is filed. The
Petitioner shall co-operate with the trial proceedings including the framing
of charges, trial proceedings, 313 of Code of Criminal Procedure
proceedings and on the date of judgment. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
27.10.2022 Index : Yes/No Rmk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
To
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Alwarkurichi Police Station, Tenkasi District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.,
Rmk
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9945 of 2022
27.10.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!