Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Sangavi vs Selvakumar
2022 Latest Caselaw 16391 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16391 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022

Madras High Court
R.Sangavi vs Selvakumar on 14 October, 2022
                                                                            TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 14.10.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                             TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022
                                                         and
                                          C.M.P(MD).Nos.5574 and 5575 of 2022

                     R.Sangavi                                               ... Petitioner

                                                           versus

                     Selvakumar                                               ... Respondent

                                  Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24
                     of C.P.C to withdraw the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.21 of 2022
                     pending on the file of the Sub Judge, Paramakudi and transfer the same
                     to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai.


                                        For Petitioner        : Mr.M.Suresh
                                        For Respondent        : Mr.B.Arun




                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022




                                                           ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking

transfer of the case in H.M.O.P.No.21 of 2022 from the file of the

learned Sub Judge, Paramakudi, to the file of the Family Court,

Sivagangai.

2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband.

The marriage between them was solemnized on 27.01.2021, as per the

Hindu Rites and Customs and out of the wedlock, they are blessed with

a male child. Due to some misunderstanding, now, they are living

separately. Thereafter, the respondent has filed H.M.O.P.No.21 of

2022 before the learned Sub Judge, Paramakudi, for divorce. Now, the

petitioner along with her ten-month-old child is living along with her

old-aged parents at Sivagangai. Since the petitioner alone has to take

care of her ten-month-old child and her old-aged parents, she finds it

difficult to travel from Sivagangai to Paramakudi. Hence, she filed the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022

present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the case in

H.M.O.P.No.21 of 2022 from the file of the learned Sub Judge,

Paramakudi to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner is having ten-month-old child and since she alone has to

take care of her child and her old-aged parents and there is no one to

accompany her, she finds it difficult to travel from Sivagangai to

Paramakudi for appearing before the Sub Court, Paramakudi, for each

and every hearing.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that

the respondent is having a life threat at the hands of the petitioner.

Therefore, he objects for transferring the case.

5. Though the respondent claims that he is having a life threat at

the hands of the petitioner, he has not produced any document to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022

substantiate the same.

6. Further, the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amitha Shah

vs- Virendar Lal Shah, reported (2003)10 SCC 609) has held that the

convenience of the wife and more so of the child must be taken into

account while deciding the petition for transfer and in the case of

Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Paradeshi reported in

(2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in such type

of transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over

the convenience of the husband.

7. This Court being satisfied with the reasons stated in the

affidavit filed in support of this petition and also taking into

consideration that the convenience of wife is to be taken into

consideration at the time of considering transfer petitions as held by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited supra, is inclined to

allow the present petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022

8. In the light of the above, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous

petition stands allowed. The proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.21 of 2022

pending on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Paramakudi, is withdrawn

and ordered to be transferred to the file of the Family Court,

Sivagangai. The Sub Court, Paramakudi, is directed to transmit the

entire case records to the Family Court, Sivagangai, forthwith. The

learned Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai, shall dispose of the case as

expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petitions are closed.

14.10.2022

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ogy

To

1. The learned Sub Judge, Paramakudi.

2. The Family Court, Sivagangai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

TR.C.M.P(MD).No.333 of 2022

14.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter