Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Murugesan vs State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 17367 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17367 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2022

Madras High Court
T.Murugesan vs State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By ... on 7 November, 2022
                                                                          WP No.42241 of 2016

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 07-11-2022

                                                        CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                               WP No.42241 of 2016



                     T.Murugesan                   ..                 Petitioner

                                                         vs.

                     1.State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its
                       Principal Secretary to the Government,
                       Finance (PGC) Department,
                       Secretariat, Fort St. George,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Principal Accountant General (A&E),
                       361, Anna Salai,
                       Teynampet,
                       Chennai - 600 018.

                     3.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts,
                       Panagal Buildings,
                       Saidapet,
                       Chennai – 600 018.         ..                  Respondents




                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                        WP No.42241 of 2016




                                  Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying for the issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring the clarification
                     letter issued by the first respondent in Letter No.61495(Ms)/PGC/2013
                     Finance (PGC) Department dated 04.02.2014 and its allied Letter No.24056/
                     PGC/2014-1 Finance (PGC) Department dated 28.05.2014 as null and void
                     and unenforceable in the eye of law direct the first respondent to issue orders
                     for the payment of arrears of Dearness Allowance for the date of retirement to
                     till date as the Dearness Allowance / Pay is one of the many component,
                     which go into the eventual determination of pension as specifically indicated
                     by the Apex Court in paragraph-30 of its judgment dated 17.01.2013 and
                     direct the first respondent to issue instruction to the third respondent to revise
                     the pension automatically as per G.O.174 dated 21.04.1998 and G.O.235
                     dated 01.06.2009 as already in paragraph-15 of G.O.363 dated 23.08.2013 as
                     far as the petitioner is concerned and pay the consequential arrears.


                                  For Petitioner                 : Mr.A.R.Nixon

                                  For Respondents-1 and 3 : Mr.V.Ravi,
                                                                  Special Government Pleader.



                                                            ORDER

The issues raised in the present writ petition were already

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.42241 of 2016

adjudicated before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the Apex Court

delivered a judgment on 17.01.2013 in Civil Appeal Nos.8848 to 8849 of

2012 filed by the Kallakurichi Taluk Retired Official Association and other

Association/individual appellants.

2. Based on the judgment of the Supreme Court, the Government

issued G.O.Ms.No.363, Finance Department, dated 23.08.2013. As per the

Government Orders issued, the exercise of revisions were already done by

the State in respect of all the pensioners, who all are falling within the

category of the retired employees between 01.06.1988 and 31.12.1995.

3. In view of the fact that the issues were decided by the

Supreme Court and based on the Government Orders issued pursuant to the

orders of the Supreme Court, the revisions were effected, no further exercise

to reconsider the issue is required.

4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. However,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.42241 of 2016

there shall be no order as to costs.

07-11-2022

Index : Yes/No.

Internet : Yes/No.

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Svn

To

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.42241 of 2016

1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Finance (PGC) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Principal Accountant General (A&E), 361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

3.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 018.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.42241 of 2016

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 42241 of 2016

07-11-2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter