Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6636 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2022
W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
and
M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011
N.Annamalai :Appellant/Petitioner
.vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Cooperative Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai.
2.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies,
(Housing),
Tirunelveli.
3.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative,
Societies(Housing),
Tirunelveli.
4.The Special Officer,
Thoothukudi Melur Cooperative
Housing Society,
Thoothukudi. : Respondents/Respondents
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
against the order dated 26.08.2021 passed in W.P(MD)No.9757 of 2011.
For Appellant :Ms.Kalaiyarasi Bharathi
For R-1 to R-3 :Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan,
Government Advocate
For R-4 :Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian
JUDGMENT
************* R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.
AND N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.
The appellant / writ petitioner challenges the dismissal of his writ
petition in W.P(MD)No.9757 of 2011.
2. The challenge in the writ petition was to the charge memo
issued. While dismissing the writ petition as not maintainable, the Writ
Court had issued certain directions regarding conduct of the enquiry.
Aggrieved by the same, the writ petitioner has come up with this writ
appeal.
3. Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, learned counsel appearing for the
fourth respondent Society would submit that the appellant was charged
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
for other delinquencies. An Enquiry Officer was appoined and the
appellant / writ petitioner was found guilty and he was removed from
service. His appeal challenging the order of removal from service, has
been dismissed. Therefore, the appellant is no longer in service.
4. Moreover, what was the subject matter of writ petition is only a
charge memo and the Writ Court has rightly concluded that the writ
petition challenging the charge memo is not maintainable. Hence, we do
not see any reason to interfere with the order of the Writ Court and the
writ appeal is therefore dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
[R.S.M.,J.] [N.S.K.,J.]
30.03.2022
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
pm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
To
1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Cooperative Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.
2.The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, (Housing), Tirunelveli.
3.The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative, Societies(Housing), Tirunelveli.
4.The Special Officer, Thoothukudi Melur Cooperative Housing Society, Thoothukudi.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.
AND N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.
pm
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)No.997 of 2011
30.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!