Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Sundar vs The Inspector General Of ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 6484 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6484 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2022

Madras High Court
K.Sundar vs The Inspector General Of ... on 30 March, 2022
                                                                                 W.P.No.14094 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED : 30.03.2022
                                                      CORAM
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
                                                W.P.No.14094 of 2021

                     K.Sundar                                                        ... Petitioner

                                                          Vs.
                     1. The Inspector General of Registration,
                        Department of Registration,
                        No.100, Santhome High Road,
                        Foreshore Estate,
                        Chennai – 600 028.

                     2. The Sub Registrar,
                        Sub Registrar Office,
                        Anna Nagar,
                        Chennai – 600 040.

                     3. R.K.Arvind
                        (Impleaded vide order dt. 09.08.2021
                        made in WMP.15748/2021 in
                        W.P.No.14094/2021)                                       ... Respondents


                     Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to

                     issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to

                     the refusal Check slip issued by the second respondent herein in Refusal

                     Number RFL/Anna Nagar/89/2021 dated 28.06.2021 refusing to register the

                     Settlement Deed dated 28.06.2021 and quash the same, consequently direct

                                                           1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         W.P.No.14094 of 2021

                     the second respondent to register the Settlement Dated 28.06.2021 presented

                     by the petitioner without insisting for the production of Original Sale Deed

                     dated 30.12.1986 registered as Document No.4419 of 1986 on the files of

                     S.R.O. Anna Nagar.

                                       For petitioner    : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan

                                       For Respondents : Mr.T.Mathi for R3

                                                            Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan
                                                            Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2

                                                              ORDER

The petitioner has filed this petition to issue a Writ of Certiorarified

Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the refusal Check slip

No.RFL/Anna Nagar/89/2021 issued by the second respondent dated

28.06.2021, refusing to register the Settlement Deed dated 28.06.2021, and

quash the same, and consequently direct the second respondent to register

the same presented by the petitioner, without insisting on the production of

Original Sale Deed, vide Document No.4419 of 1986 dated 30.12.1986 on

the file of the S.R.O., Anna Nagar.

2. Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, learned Special Government Pleader

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14094 of 2021

takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. In view of the limited relief sought

for in this petition and on the consent expressed by the learned counsel

appearing on either side, this petition is taken up for final disposal.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner and his brother are

the joint owners of the property comprised in S.No.50, T.S.No.20, Block

No.3, Periya Kudal Village, Egmore-Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai .

When the petitioner's brother refused to hand over the original parent

document, he filed a Suit against his brother for partition and the same is

pending before this Court in C.S.No.87 of 2021. Thereafter, the petitioner

executed a Settlement Deed dated 28.06.2021 for registration in favour of

his wife one S.Chitra, and the same was presented before the second

respondent along with the certified copies of parent document. However, the

said documents were refused to be registered along with a refusal check slip

in Refusal No.RFL/Anna Nagar/89/2021 dated 28.06.2021 by the second

respondent on the ground that Original Sale Deed was not annexed along

with the document which is presented for registration. Challenging the same,

the present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for the above relief.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14094 of 2021

4. Though very many grounds have been raised, learned counsel for

the petitioner submits that though the petitioner annexed the certified copy

of the parent document, even then, the second respondent refused to register

the document, which is not sustainable. The issue involved in the present

case is no more res-integra. He further relied upon the order of this Court in

W.P.(MD)No.19745 of 2020, Sivanadiyan Vs. The Sub Registrar,

Pudukottai dated 11.02.2021. The relevant portion of the above said order is

extracted hereunder:-

"8.This Court is entirely in agreement with the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner in this regard. The latest decision of the learned Single Judge appears to have not considered the implication of the Circular with reference to the scheme of the relevant Act. On the other hand, the above three decisions cited on behalf of the petitioner would certainly hold the field and in which event, insistence on production of original Title Deeds by the Registering Authority is without any authority of law. The Circular issued by the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai in this regard cannot have any sanctity, unless the power of issuance of such Circular is authorized under the provisions of the Act. This Court has consistently held that no such power can be read into Act, in the absence of any specific provisions and in that view of the matter, as rightly

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14094 of 2021

contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the subject issue is no more res-integra. As far as the latest decision of the learned Single Judge is concerned, being a kind of a contra view, this Court is of the opinion that the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.16768 of 2020, dated 26.11.2020 has not appreciated the provisions of the Act, as the reasons of the learned Single Judge are contrary to the well considered earlier Judgments of this Court. The learned Judge has reasoned without any specific reference to the scheme of the Act, which governs the registration."

5. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents 1 and 2 submits that the document presented by the petitioner

was rejected by the 2nd respondent on the ground that Original parent

document was not annexed along with the document sought to be registered.

6. Mr.T.Mathi learned counsel appearing for the third respondent

submits that the third respondent is the owner of the property in question.

He further submits that earlier, the petitioner filed a Suit in C.S.No.87 of

2021 against him for partition and the same is pending before this Court.

Even then, alienating the above said property is not sustainable. Hence this

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14094 of 2021

Court may permit the private respondent to appear before the second

respondent and the second respondent may pass appropriate orders in terms

of Registration Act, 1908, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the

private respondent, on merits and in accordance with law

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is seen that

the petitioner claims that he is the owner of the above said property and the

3rd respondent claim that the petitioner is not the owner of the said property

and the partition Suit in C.S.No.87 of 2021 is pending before this Court.

However, mere pendency of the Suit is not a bar for entertaining the

registration of the documents. Hence, the reason stated by the third

respondent is not sustainable, in view of the decision of this Court in

W.P.(MD)No.19745 of 2020, order dated 11.02.2021 (supra), which makes

it clear that, there is no need to present the Original parent document, and a

certified copy of the parent document is sufficient to entertain the document

for registration.

8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of and the petitioner is

directed to present the copy of the parent document and to pay requisite

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14094 of 2021

Stamp Duty and Registration Charges and if copy of such document is

produced before the second respondent, he is directed to entertain the

document so presented by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, after

affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned including the 3 rd

respondent herein, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt

presentation of such document for registration. No costs.

30.03.2022

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order : Yes / No rap/jd Note to Registry: Issue order copy today i.e.,11.04.2022

To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai – 600 028.

2. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 040.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

rap

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14094 of 2021

W.P.No.14094 of 2021

30.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter