Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maduraiyil Sivakasi Nadar'S ... vs The Commissioner
2022 Latest Caselaw 6452 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6452 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2022

Madras High Court
Maduraiyil Sivakasi Nadar'S ... vs The Commissioner on 29 March, 2022
                                                                         W.P(MD).No.5479 of 2022

                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 29.03.2022

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                            W.P(MD).No.5479 of 2022
                                                      and
                                       W.M.P(MD).Nos.4434 and 4436 of 2022

                Maduraiyil Sivakasi Nadar's Uravinmurai,
                Represented by its Secretary,
                K.S.N.R.Jeyaprakash                                               ... Petitioner

                                                        Vs.

                The Commissioner,
                Madurai Corporation,
                Madurai.                                                          ...Respondent

                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records from the
                respondent in his proceedings dated 12.03.2022, demanding an amount of
                Rs.10,14,035/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Fourteen Thousand and Thirty Five Only)
                towards the property tax, water tax and underground drainage tax for the
                period 2009-2010-I to 2021-2022-II along with previous year and quash the
                same.


                                  For Petitioner   : Mr.N.Sathish Babu
                                  For Respondent   : Mr.S.Vinayak
                                                     Standing Counsel


                1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           W.P(MD).No.5479 of 2022



                                                    ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing

Counsel for the respondent.

2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned notice merely on the

ground that the petitioner has secured an order vide judgment and decree from

the Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai, in O.S.No.1730 of 1987 and in

O.S.No.1844 of 1987 on 31.01.1991.

3. The authority has to determine whether the petitioner is liable to pay

tax or not under the Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1971.

Incidentally, this Court in W.P.(MD)No.14508 of 2016 etc., batch, by a

common order, dated 22.11.2017, had rejected the prayer for interference, by

directing the Educational Trust to approach the authorities under the Act.

4. I have also recently passed an order in W.P.No.1639 of 2020 on

14.03.2022 in The Institute of Franciscan Missionaries of Mary Vs The

Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation and others,

wherein, the case laws relating to charitable case law was discussed. The

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD).No.5479 of 2022

authorities are required to consider whether the activities of the petitioner are

charitable in nature so as to exempt the petitioner from payment of tax.

5. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I

dispose the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file appropriate reply to

the show cause notice by producing documents to substantiate that the

petitioner is indeed entitled for exemption under Section 123 (e) of the

Madurai Municipal City Corporation Act, 1971. The petitioner shall file such

reply within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of this

order. The respondent thereafter shall pass appropriate orders on merits and in

accordance with law after duly considering all the case laws, within a period

of two months. In all, the entire proceedings shall be completed within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is

made clear that any amount paid by the petitioner shall be without prejudice

to the petitioner’s rights. No costs. Consequently, the connected

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

                                                                                   29.03.2022

                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes/ No
                sn
                                                                              C.SARAVANAN, J.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                          W.P(MD).No.5479 of 2022

                                                              sn




                To

                The Commissioner,
                Madurai Corporation,
                Madurai.




                                       W.P(MD).No.5479 of 2022




                                                     29.03.2022





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter