Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Muthu vs The Secretary
2022 Latest Caselaw 6263 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6263 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2022

Madras High Court
A.Muthu vs The Secretary on 28 March, 2022
                                                                            W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022


                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED : 28.03.2022

                                                        CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY
                                                       and
                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                                W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022

                     A.Muthu                                                       .. Appellant
                                                           Vs
                     1.The Secretary,
                       School Education Department,
                       Fort St.George, Secretariat,
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Joint Director of School Education,(HSC)
                       Directorate of School Education,
                       Nungambakkam, Chennai.

                     3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       Pudhukottai District,
                       Pudhukottai.                                             .. Respondents
                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                     against the order dated 15.02.2022 made in W.P.(MD) No. 22547 of
                     2019.

                                       For Appellant   : Mr.K.Jeyamohan
                                       For             : Mr.S.P.Maharajan,
                                       Respondents       Special Government Pleader

                                                       JUDGMENT

[Delivered by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.]

Challenge in this writ appeal is made to the order dated 15

February 2022 recorded on W.P(MD) No.22547 of 2019. This appeal

is by the writ petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022

2. The petitioner had approached this Court with the

prayer that his service should have been regularized from

08.07.2004 instead of 01.06.2006, which was ordered by the State

at the relevant time. This petition was filed in the year 2019. While

dismissing the writ petition, learned Single Judge inter-alia observed

as under:

“7. Incidentally, this Court asked the learned

counsel for the petitioner as to, what is the working

hours of these teachers working in schools. It is stated

that these teachers are working 14 hours per week. A

week consists of 168 hours (7x24). Out of 168 hours, a

P.G. Assistant is working 14 hours per week and drawing

a salary of more than One Lakh. The salary has been

paid from and out of the tax payers money. The

responsibility and accountability attached to these

teachers are far more higher than the employees

working in private sectors. Teaching is a noble

profession. Teachers are expected to maintain good

conduct. The teachers, being the responsible persons in

the society, imparting education to the children, their

conduct in the society must be upto the mark and full

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022

devotion to duty is of paramount importance. Painfully,

there are several instances now in the public domain

that teachers are involving in many heinous offences,

including sexual harassment of children studying in the

schools. Many number of such cases are frequently

reported in recent days. The Department of Education

has to take effective measures to control the conduct of

these teachers across the State of Tamil Nadu.

8. The decent salary paid to these teachers

whether in commensuration with the performance of

their duties and hours of duty are to be reviewed by the

competent authorities of the Government for the

purpose of enforcing work discipline in schools.

Allotment of works are to be regulated.

9. Even during the pandemic situation, near

about 4 crores employees lost their job. Many families

lost their livelihood on account of several factors. Small

industries are struggling to revive their business. Even

under these conditions, the teachers are being paid full

salary for about two years, though the schools were

completely closed. In some States across the country, a

portion of the salary was deducted from the government

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022

employees so as to provide assistance to the COVID

affected people, who lost their regular income. Even

such measures are not taken by the State of Tamil

Nadu. Contrarily, throughout pandemic, the teachers are

getting full salary without even attending the school or

otherwise.

10. The Government of the day is expected to

protect the public interest and the public money. The

Government cannot waste the public money and the

constitution mandates that the State spends money

judiciously and in the interest of public and at no

circumstances, Government can spend money, which is

not in consonance with the public welfare schemes.

Therefore, a balancing approach is required. No doubt,

these teachers are entitled for a decent salary. However,

it is to be considered whether they are performing their

duties in accordance with the rules in force and to the

expectation to the parents and the students who all are

studying in the school.

11. This Court is of the considered opinion that

no doubt corrective measures are taken by the

Government then and there. However, the measures are

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022

found to be insufficient to bring back work discipline in

schools. The teachers, who all are working in the

schools and their activities and conduct both inside and

outside the schools are to be monitored by the

appropriate authorities and periodical reports are to be

submitted to the higher authorities for taking effective

measures and actions.”

3. Having heard learned advocates for the

respective parties and having considered the material on record and

keeping in view the point at issue in the writ petition we find that,

the reasons recorded in the order under challenge, more particularly

in para: 7 to 11 were not relevant for deciding the claim of the

petitioner. According to us, those observations / directions are

unwarranted and therefore the same need to be expunged from the

impugned order.

4. We however find that, in any case, the case of

the petitioner as pleaded in the writ petition filed in the year 2019

was, making some grievance with regard to perceived injustice to

him in the year 2006. We find that, such a stale claim could not

have been entertained in the writ jurisdiction in exercising powers

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

5. The final conclusion of dismissing the writ

petition, according to us, can not be said to be any error apparent

on the face of the record, which may call for any interference in this

intra-court appeal. This appeal is disposed of in above terms. No

costs.

                                                                    [P.U., J]         [R.V., J]
                                                                             28.03.2022
                     Index        : No
                     pkn/3




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                       W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022



                                    PARESH UPADHYAY, J.
                                                  and
                                      R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.


                                                       pkn




                                  W.A(MD)No.281 of 2022




                                              28.03.2022




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter