Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4423 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022
Cont.P.No.250 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Contempt Petition No.250 of 2022
N.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner
vs
1.Kakarla Usha, IAS, Secretary
to Government, Education
Department, Secretariat,
Chennai-9.
2.K.Arivoli, Director of
Elementary Education,
DPI Campus, Chennai-6.
3.Tmt.S.Jackkulin Rosi,
Block Education Officer,
Additional Assistant Elementary
Educational Officer,
Bhuvanagiri Block,
Cuddalore District. .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,
1971 to punish respondents 1 to 3 for willful disobedience of the
judgment of this Court dated 14.7.2021 made in W.A.No.370 of 2021.
___________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.250 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Kumar
For Respondents : Mrs.Mythreye Chandru,
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The contempt petition has been filed in reference to the
judgment dated 14.07.2021 passed by the Division Bench wherein no
direction has been given. Rather, the appeal preferred by the
respondents was dismissed upholding the order of the learned Single
Judge. Thus, if at all compliance is to be sought, it should be with
regard to the order of the learned Single Judge and thus, contempt
would be maintainable before the learned Single Judge.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt
petition was earlier preferred before the learned Single Judge,
however, it was dismissed on account of the interim order passed in
the appeal and thereupon, the appeal was dismissed by the Division
Bench. Thus, the contempt petition has been filed before the Division
Bench.
3. We do not find non-compliance of the judgment of the Division
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.250 of 2022
Bench because the judgment therein is only affirming the order of the
learned Single Judge. The contempt is alleging non-compliance of the
order of the learned Single Judge and thereby, the petition would be
maintainable before the learned Single Judge.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present
contempt petition with liberty to maintain it before the learned Single
Judge.
5. The prayer aforesaid is granted and otherwise, as per the
observation of the Division Bench also, the contempt would be
maintainable before the learned Single Judge now after the dismissal
of the writ appeal.
The contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed with the liberty
aforesaid.
(M.N.B., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
07.03.2022
Index : Yes/No
M.N.Bhandari, CJ.
and
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.250 of 2022
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
RS
Cont.P.No.250 of 2022
07.03.2022
___________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!