Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Sumathi vs Thiruvannamalai Gandhi Nagar ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 4142 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4142 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2022

Madras High Court
T.Sumathi vs Thiruvannamalai Gandhi Nagar ... on 3 March, 2022
                                                                              C.R.P(NPD)No.427 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                         CORAM

                                                      DATED: 03.03.2022

                                   THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                               C.R.P.(NPD).No.427 of 2022
                                                and CMP No.2191 of 2022


                     S.Thirunavukarasu (Deceased)
                     1.T.Sumathi
                     2.T.Monika
                     3.T.Shanmugaraj                                             ... Petitioners
                                                      Vs.
                     1.Thiruvannamalai Gandhi Nagar Co-Operative House,
                       Building Society Limited,
                       Rep by its Secretary,
                       D.Chandrasekaran
                       Gandhi Nagar, Thiruvannamalai Town.

                     2.Bakkiyam Ammal                                             ....Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil
                     Procedure Code r/w under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set
                     aside the Adjudication Order/Docket Order passed in E.P.No.1 of 2012 in
                     O.S.No.200 of 2002 dated 23.12.2021 by the Hon'ble Principal Sub Judge at
                     Thiruvannamalai.
                                    For Petitioners      :   Mr.M.Prabakar

                                    For R1               :   Mr.M.R.Gokula Krishnan
                                                             Additional Government Pleader


                     Page No:1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            C.R.P(NPD)No.427 of 2022



                                                       ORDER

The Revision Petitioner herein has challenged the Adjudication/Docket

Order passed in E.P.No.1 of 2012 in O.S.No.200 of 2002, dated 23.12.2021,

by the Principal Sub Judge, Thiruvannamalai.

2. The grand children of the decree holder has come forward with the

revision resisting delivery of property. The first respondent herein had filed

a civil suit in O.S.No.200 of 2002 and obtained a decree in its favour.

Pursuant to the above said decree, the grand father and the grand mother

(i.e. the second respondent herein) of the revision petitioners had filed an

appeal in A.S.No.5 of 2009 and obtained a decree in their favour.

Aggrieved by the same, the first respondent herein had preferred an appeal

before this Court in S.A.No.1420 of 2010 and it was allowed by this Court

vide judgment dated 23.03.2011. This Court, in effect, confirmed the

judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in O.S.No.200 of 2002, and

set aside the judgment and decree passed by the appellate Court.

Page No:2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(NPD)No.427 of 2022

2.2. In the mean time, the grand father of the revision petitioner died

and the father of the revision petitioner stepped in. Be that as it may, the

first respondent had filed E.P.No.1 of 2012 in O.S.No.200 of 2002 before

the Principal Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai, for obtaining delivery of property.

The revision petitioner's father had filed E.A.No.11 of 2014 in E.P.No.1 of

2012 in O.S.No.200 of 2002. After his death, the revision petitioners

stepped in. The only grievance of the revision petitioners is that they were

not heard.

3. Mr.M.Prabakar, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there is

a violation of principle of natural justice since the revision petitioners were

not heard. He further added that, a party who might be aggrieved by any

order that may be passed by a Court without hearing the parties is a

violation of principal of natural justice and it is a right of the parties to be

pre-heard before the order is passed.

4. The factual scenario of the case is that the judgment debtor can offer only

very little resistance to the E.P. It is not demonstrated before this Court

what right of the revision petitioners is under peril which the execution

Page No:3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(NPD)No.427 of 2022

court has ignored in executing the decree. In the given circumstances, the

alleged denial of right of hearing is essentially cosmetic in character, and

this court is plainly not interested with the same.

5. This court does not find any merits in this petition and the Civil Revision

Petition is dismissed accordingly. No costs. Consequently connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.03.2022

msv/psa

To

1. The Principal Sub Judge, Thiruvannamalai.

2. The Secretary, Thiruvannamalai Gandhi Nagar Co-Operative House, Building Society Limited, Gandhi Nagar, Thiruvannamalai Town.

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

Page No:4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P(NPD)No.427 of 2022

N.SESHASAYEE,J.,

msv/psa

C.R.P.(NPD).No.427 of 2022 and CMP No.2191 of 2022

03.03.2022

Page No:5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter