Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Dhinakaran vs M/S.Shriram Transport Finance
2022 Latest Caselaw 4043 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4043 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2022

Madras High Court
D.Dhinakaran vs M/S.Shriram Transport Finance on 2 March, 2022
                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 02.03.2022

                                                     CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

                                              C.M.A(MD)No.296 of 2018


                     D.Dhinakaran                                       ... Appellant

                                                       vs.


                     1.M/s.Shriram Transport Finance
                       Company Limited
                       Tenkasi Branch,
                       Represented by its Authorised Representative
                       Tr.K.Rajeshkumar

                     2.M.Ramanathan

                     3.S.Ayyadurai                                      ... Respondents



                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act praying this Court to set aside the executable and fair
                     order dated 10.02.2017 made in Arbitration O.P.No.86 of 2015 by the
                     learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, against the award in
                     Arbitration Case No.563 of 2013 dated 05.02.2015 passed by the learned
                     Sole Arbitrator, Tirunelveli, by allowing this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
                     with costs throughout.


                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                        For Appellant      : Ms.S.Akila
                                        For R1             : Mr.Anand C.Rajesh

                                        For R2 & R3        : No appearance



                                                    JUDGMENT

*************

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to set aside the

executable and fair order dated 10.02.2017 made in Arbitration O.P.No.

86 of 2015 by the learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, against

the award in Arbitration Case No.563 of 2013 dated 05.02.2015 passed

by the learned Sole Arbitrator, Tirunelveli.

2.The financier has initiated the arbitration proceedings by

appointing the arbitrator and the case was taken as Arbitration Case No.

563 of 2013. Notice was served upon the appellant and he has also

engaged an advocate. Subsequently, he has not contested the case and

an award was passed on 05.02.2015 directing the petitioner/appellant

herein to pay a sum of Rs.54,579/- along with 18% interest from the date

of claim petition till the date of realization.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3.Challenging the said award, Arbitration OP has been filed before

the learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, in Ar.O.P.No.86 of 2015

under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. In the said

proceedings, three major points have been agitated namely sufficient

opportunity was not given to the appellant, the factum that the vehicle

was subsequently sold by the M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Company

Ltd., and the said amount was not properly adjusted and the rate of

interest claimed by the borrower is higher.

4.The learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, after going

through the records has found that one advocate Mr.M.A.Abdul Majeeth

has entered appearance for the appellant herein. Inspite of sufficient

opportunity being offered, he has not contested the case. Hence, the

Arbitrator decided the case on merits and therefore, the plea of

insufficiency of the hearing has also been negatived. The insurance

premium for the vehicle has to be paid by the borrower as per Article 4 of

the Hypothecation Agreement (Ex.A2) and therefore, the same cannot be

treated as excessive payment. With regard to rate of interest, there is a

specific clause in the Hypothecation Agreement as rightly observed by

the Arbitrator. Considering the scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis and Conciliation Act, 1996, the learned Principal District Judge, has

rejected the said Arbitration OP and hence, the appellant/respondent in

the Arbitration Proceedings has filed the present appeal.

5.The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that the

excess payment has not been considered by the Arbitrator and there is no

sufficient opportunity to defend the case.

6.The very same objections have been raised before the lower

Appellate Court and the same has been negatived by assigning the

reasons as stated supra.

7.In view of the factual position as revealed from the records, I do

not find any merits in this case. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous

Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

10.02.2022

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No cp

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To

1.The Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.S.Ayyadurai, Sole Arbitrator, Tirunelveli.

3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.

cp

JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)No.296 of 2018

02.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter