Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.A.Josseph vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 3366 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3366 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022

Madras High Court
P.A.Josseph vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 23 February, 2022
                                                                      W.P.No.3681 of 2022



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 23.2.2022

                                                     CORAM :

                                    THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,
                                                  CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                       AND
                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY


                                                W.P.No.3681 of 2022

                     P.A.Josseph                                      .. Petitioner

                                                          Vs

                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu
                       Rep by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat
                       Buildings Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

                     2.The State of Tamil Nadu
                       Rep by its Principal Secretary, School
                       Education Department, Secretariat Buildings
                       Fort st George, Chennai-9.

                     3.The Director
                       Directorate of School Education,
                       DPI Campus, Chennai-6.

                     4.State of Tamil Nadu
                       Rep by its Principle Secretary, Health and
                       Family Welfare (MCA-I) Department
                       Fort St. George, Chennai-9.




                     ___________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           W.P.No.3681 of 2022



                     5.The Under Secretary
                       Prime Minister Office, South Block
                       Raisina Hill, New Delhi-110 011

                     6.The Secretary
                       Ministry of Education, 124-C Shastri Bhawan
                       Delhi-110 001                                       .. Respondents


                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India
                     praying for the issuance of a Writ Mandamus directing respondents No.
                     1 to 4 to adopt the NCRET Syllabus from elementary to higher
                     secondary in all Tamil Nadu government and government aided
                     schools to enhance the education in order to meet all central and other
                     state governments entrance qualifying and employment exams based
                     on his representations dated 08.02.2021 and 23.08.2021 for that 5th
                     to 6th respondents allot sufficient fund to Tamil Nadu Government to
                     implement NCERT syllabus in all government schools as well as provide
                     orientation programs to government school teachers for enhancing
                     their teaching level and develop the sophisticated infrastructure as
                     soon as possible or upcoming academic year.


                                   For Petitioner           : Mr.R.Barnabas

                                   For Respondents          : Mr.P.Muthukumar
                                                              State Government Pleader
                                                              for R1 and R4

                                                             Mrs.T.Mythreye Chandru
                                                             Special Government Pleader
                                                             for R2 and R3

                                                             Mr.Prasath Ramasamy,
                                                             Central        Government
                                                             Standing Counsel for R5 and
                                                             R6


                     ___________
                     Page 2 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.P.No.3681 of 2022




                                                           ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to

respondents 1 to 4 to adopt NCERT syllabus from elementary to

higher secondary schools in the State of Tamil Nadu, so that the

students studying in the Government Schools may compete

properly for the next examination, which may be either for higher

studies or for any other competition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to refer to

any provision which mandates the State Government to adopt the

NCERT syllabus for the Government schools. Rather, the State

Government has come out with a syllabus and the challenge to that

did not sustain up to the Supreme Court. It was in the case of State

of Tamil Nadu & Others Vs. K.Shyam Sundar & Others [Civil Appeal

Nos.6015-6027 of 2011 dated 09.8.2011]. Apart from that, it being

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3681 of 2022

a policy decision not shown to be in violation of the statutory

provisions, the jurisdiction of this Court would be very limited. It is

up to the State Government to take a policy decision regarding

syllabus, whether to adopt NCERT syllabus or to provide some other

syllabus as per the Rules.

4. That being the position, the direction as sought for by the

petitioner cannot be granted. It is more so when the judgment of

the Allahabad High Court referred to by the petitioner in the case of

Shiv Kumar Pathak Vs. State of U.P. [W.P.No.57476 of 2013 dated

18.8.2015] has no application to the facts of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed finding that it is

devoid of merits. There will be no order as to costs.

                                                                   (M.N.B., CJ.)      (D.B.C.J.)
                                                                            23.2.2022
                     Index : Yes/No




                     ___________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3681 of 2022

To:

1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Buildings Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings Fort st George, Chennai-9.

3.The Director Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-6.

4.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principle Secretary, Health and Family Welfare (MCA-I) Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

5.The Under Secretary Prime Minister Office, South Block Raisina Hill, New Delhi-110 011

6.The Secretary Ministry of Education, 124-C Shastri Bhawan Delhi-110 001

RS

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.3681 of 2022

M.N.BHANDARI, CJ AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J

RS

W.P.No.3681 of 2022

23.2.2022

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter