Madras High Court
S.K.Kumar vs S.Sukumar on 2 February, 2022
OSA.No.207 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
O.S.A.No.207 of 2019 and CMP.No.18772 of 2019
S.K.Kumar ... Appellant
-vs-
S.Sukumar ... Respondent
Original Side Appeal filed under Order 36 Rule I of Original Side
Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letter Patent against the judgment
and decree dated 09.04.2019 passed in A.No.2785 of 2019 in
C.S.No.248/2019 by a learned Single Judge of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.G.RM.Palaniappan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Anil Sandeep
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was pronounced by T.RAJA, J.)
This Original Side Appeal has been filed against the judgment
and decree dated 09.04.2019 passed in A.No.2785 of 2019 in
C.S.No.248/2019 by a learned Single Judge of this Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
2. The matter was listed to-day under the caption, 'for
reporting settlement'.
3. When the matter was called, learned Counsel on either
side by producing a Joint Memo of Compromise dated 01.02.2022
signed by both the parties and themselves requested this Court to
accept the same and dispose of the Appeal.
4. In this regard, it is relevant to extract the Joint Memo of
Compromise here under:
JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE FILED BY THE
APPELLANT AND THE RESPONDENT
The appellant and the respondent jointly submit as
follows:
1. The appellant is the defendant and the
respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in C.S.No.248 of
2019 on the file of this Hon'ble Court. The present appeal
has been filed by the appellant/defendant as against the
order dated 09.04.2019 passed in A.No.2785 of 2019 in
C.S.No.248 of 2019 ordering the furnishing of security by
the appellant/defendant in the above suit. For the sake of
convenience, the statuses of the parties are arrayed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
herein, as per their status in the suit in C.S.No.248 of
2019.
2. The plaintiff's son and the defendant's
daughter were engaged to be married, but after the
betrothal function, there were disputes amongst the bride
and the bridegroom which resulted in the calling-off the
marriage. A compromise agreement dated 13.05.2015
and an agreement of sale dated 13.05.2015 entered into
between the plaintiff and the defendant and the terms of
those documents including the nine cheques issued by the
plaintiff to the defendant for a sum of Rs.4.25 Crores and
a sum of Rs.75,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Lakhs
Only) paid by the plaintiff to the defendant at that time,
had all become the subject matters of disputes between
the plaintiff and the defendant.
3. The plaintiff had thereafter preferred a police
complaint in the matter and an F.I.R. in Crime Number
449 of 2015 had been registered on the file of the Central
Crime Branch at Chennai and is pending investigation.
4. The plaintiff had also filed a suit in
O.S.No.4242 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble III
Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai, for declaring the said
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
compromise agreement dated 13.05.2015 and the
agreement of sale dated 13.05.2015 as null and void and
for consequential injunctions, and the said suit is pending
disposal.
5. The plaintiff had filed the suit in C.S.No.248 of
2019 as against the defendant for the recovery of money
of a sum of Rs.1,24,75,000/- (Rupees One Crore Twenty
Four Lakhs and Seventy Five Thousand Only). In the said
suit, an ex-parte order had been passed in Application
No.2785 of 2019 ordering to furnish security by the
defendant, as against which the present appeal has been
filed by the defendant who is the appellant herein.
6. The defendant had preferred complaints
against the plaintiff under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act r/w.Section 420 of IPC in C.C.No.1108 of
2016, C.C.No.1109/2016 and C.C.No.1246 of 2016 on the
file of the Fast Track Court-III (Metropolitan Magistrate),
Saidapet, Chennai, in respect of the said nine cheques for
Rs.4.25 Crores, for the offence of dishonour of cheques,
which are all pending disposal.
WHEREAS after filing of the above appeal,
negotiations and discussions were held between the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
plaintiff and the defendant so as to avoid litigations. After
deliberations and discussions, the parties hereto have
amicably settled the disputes between them and have
agreed and arrived at the following terms and conditions
governing the issues involved between them, which have
been reduced into writing:
NOW THIS MEMO OF COMPROMISE WITNESSETH AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The plaintiff hereby waives and gives up all
claims whatsoever as against the defendant including any
claim for jewels, silver articles and monies. The plaintiff
has foregone the said sum of Rs.75,00,000/- (Rupees
Seventy Five Lakhs Only) given to the defendant.
Likewise, the defendant hereby waives and gives up all
claims whatsoever as against the plaintiff including any
claim for jewels, silver articles and monies. The defendant
has given up his claim in respect of the said nine cheques
for Rs.4.25 Crores issued by the plaintiff.
2. The plaintiff shall withdraw the said suit in
O.S.No.4242 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble III
Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai, which has been filed
for declaration and injunction, on the next possible
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
hearing date.
3. The plaintiff shall withdraw the said suit in
C.S.No.248 of 2019 on the file of this Hon'ble Court, which
has been filed for recovery of money, on the next possible
hearing date.
4. The defendant shall withdraw the complaints
filed against the plaintiff in C.C.No.1108 of 2016,
C.C.No.1109 of 2016 and C.C.No.1246 of 2016 on the file
of Hon'ble Fast Track Court-III (Metropolitan Magistrate),
Saidapet, Chennai, in respect of the said nine cheques for
Rs.4.25 Crores.
5. The plaintiff shall not proceed further with the
FIR in crime number 449 of 2015 registered on the file of
the Central Crime Branch at Chennai.
6. The plaintiff and the defendant shall co-
operate with each other for the withdrawal and
culmination of all the litigations and complaints against
each other and shall ensure the compliance of this joint
memo of compromise.
7. The parties hereto agree that this Memo of
Compromise has been entered into between them, on their
own volition and in the absence of any coercion, force or
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
undue influence. The parties hereto agree that this Joint
Memo of Compromise shall be taken on file and shall be
recorded for passing of a decree to this effect.''
5. In view of the above, the plaintiff/respondent herein has
agreed to withdraw the pending suit in O.S.No.4242/2015, on the file
of the learned III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, seeking
declaration and injunction and also the suit in C.S.No.248/2019 on
the file of this Court seeking recovery of money, most probably, on
the next possible hearing date and the defendant/appellant herein
has also mutually agreed to withdraw the complaints preferred
against the respondent herein/plaintiff under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 420 of IPC in
C.C.Nos.1108, 1109 and 1246/2016 on the file of the Fast Track Court
No.III (Metropolitan Magistrate), Saidapet, Chennai. Therefore, when
the parties have agreed to resolve all pending issues, the Joint Memo
of Compromise filed by them is taken on record and in terms of the
said Compromise Memo, the present Original Side Appeal stands
disposed of. Needless to mention that the Joint Memo of Compromise
shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
(T.R.J.,) (D.B.C.J.,)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
02.02.2022
tsi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
T.RAJA, J.
and
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
tsi
OSA.No.207 of 2019
02.02.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
OSA.No.207 of 2019
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
