Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1596 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2022
Tax Case Appeal Nos. 542 to 545 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal Nos. 542 to 545 of 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai .. Appellant in all cases
Versus
D. Satish Kumar .. Respondent in all cases
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the common order dated 28.08.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench, in I.T.A.Nos.580 to 583/Mds/2009.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravi Kumar in all cases
For Respondent : Mr.R.Raghavan in all cases
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Tax Case Appeal Nos. 542 to 545 of 2010
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant / Revenue, calling
in question the correctness of the common order dated 28.08.2009 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, in
I.T.A.Nos.580 to 583/Mds/2009, relating to the assessment years 2001-02 to
2004-05.
2.By order dated 12.07.2010, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeals on the following substantial question of law:
“(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the order of the CIT under section 263 is not sustainable in law?
(ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that deduction under Section 80HHC cannot be reduced bythe amount of deduction sought under Section 80IB?”
3. When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes, wherein, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Tax Case Appeal Nos. 542 to 545 of 2010
it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before
the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-
(Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in these appeals are
less than the threshold limit.
3. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for
the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be
less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open
the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate cases. No
costs.
[R.M.D, J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
01.02.2022
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
dhk
To
1. Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “D” Bench.
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Chennai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Tax Case Appeal Nos. 542 to 545 of 2010
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
dhk
TCA Nos. 542 to 545 of 2010
01.02.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!