Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14044 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2022
T.C.A.No.204 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 05.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal No.204 of 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estate (P) Ltd.
Old No.11, New No.21, 2nd Main Road
Gandhi Nagar
Adyar, Chennai 600 020
PAN : AAACR2276A .. Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the order dated 30.08.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.1593/Mds/2012.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman
for Mr.S.Sridhar
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.No.204 of 2014
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
This tax case appeal has been filed by the appellant/Revenue, calling in
question the correctness of the order dated 30.08.2013 passed by the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.No.1593/Mds/2012,
relating to the assessment year 2009-10.
2. By order dated 17.04.2014, this Court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeal on the following substantial question of law :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that developer or builder, is eligible for claiming benefit u/s.80(IB)(10) and assessee can be treated as developer or builder, eligible for claiming benefit u/s.80(IB)(10) of the Income Tax Act?”
3. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel
for the appellant/Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeal shall not be filed/pursued by the Department
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.204 of 2014
before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
this appeal is less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant/Revenue, the present appeal, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case.
No costs.
[R.M.D, J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
05.08.2022
Index : Yes / No
gya
To
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle V(1), Chennai 600 034
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) V Chennai 600 034
4.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.204 of 2014
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gya
Tax Case Appeal No.204 of 2014
05.08.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!