Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14032 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2022
T.C.A.Nos.581 to 584 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 05.08.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Tax Case Appeal Nos.581 to 584 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai III .. Appellant in all T.C.As
Vs.
M/s.Road Safety Club Pvt. Ltd.
4 Lady Desikachari Road
Mylapore, Chennai 600 004 .. Respondent in all T.C.As
Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
against the common order dated 11.07.2008 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, in respective I.T.A.Nos.382/Mds/06,
2429/Mds/06, 775/Mds/2007 and 2341/Mds/2007.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar &
in all T.C.As Mrs.R.Hemalatha
Senior Standing Counsels
For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman
in all T.C.As
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
T.C.A.Nos.581 to 584 of 2010
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant/Revenue, calling
in question the correctness of the common order dated 11.07.2008 passed by
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, for the assessment
years 2001-02 to 2004-05.
2. By order dated 13.07.2010, this Court admitted the aforesaid tax case
appeals on the following substantial question of law :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that only
1/8th of the total membership fees received during the previous
year relevant to the assessment year should be treated as the
income of the assessee ?”
3. When these matters were taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel for the appellant/Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular
No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes,
wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the
Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed
Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
T.C.A.Nos.581 to 584 of 2010
these appeals are less than the threshold limit.
4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel
for the appellant/Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to
be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as withdrawn, keeping
open the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases.
No costs.
[R.M.D, J.] [M.S.Q, J.]
05.08.2022
Index : Yes / No
gya
To
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai III
2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
'B' Bench
Chennai
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Company Circle-V(4)
Chennai
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
AND
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.Nos.581 to 584 of 2010
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
gya
Tax Case Appeal Nos.581 to 584 of 2010
05.08.2022 (1/2)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!