Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9239 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2022
W.A.No.1287 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 29.04.2022
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Writ Appeal No.1287 of 2022
and
CMP.Nos.8110 and 8111 of 2022
M/s.Prem Automobiles,
Represented by its Proprietor,
Pinkesh Jain,
No.7, Kamaraj Salai,
Puducherry – 605 011.
...Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer – GDII
100 Feet Road, Ellaipillaichavadi,
Puducherry – 605 005.
...Respondent
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside
the order passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No.9643 of 2022 dated
20.04.2022.
For Appellant : Mr.Rajendran
for Mr.M.Ramamoorthi
For Respondent : Mr.J.Kumaran,
Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/1
W.A.No.1287 of 2022
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Writ Appeal arises out of the adjudicatory order dated 20.04.2022
passed by the learned Judge in W.P.No.9643 of 2022, which is extracted
below, for the sake of clarify:
“Mr.J.Kumaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry) accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. He submits that within a week period final orders would be passed and report before this Court.
2. Post the matter on 27.04.2022.”
2.It is the grievance of the appellant / writ petitioner that the authority
has not furnished the documents sought by the appellant nor has the authority
even permitted the inspection of the documents and hence, the adjudicatory
order of the learned Judge is contrary to law, against the facts and
circumstances of the case and in violation of the principles of natural justice.
3.On the other hand, the learned Additional Government Pleader
(Puducherry) appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submitted that the
authority concerned has already passed the final order on 25.04.2022 and for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1287 of 2022
production of the order copy only, the writ petition stood adjourned to
27.04.2022, by the learned Judge. Thus, according to the learned counsel, the
order impugned in the writ appeal, is nothing but a direction issued for
production of the order copy passed by the authority concerned.
4.In reply, the learned counsel for the appellant sought liberty to the
appellant to challenge the final order passed by the authority concerned in the
manner known to law.
5.In view of the above, this writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous,
granting such liberty to the appellant. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
(R.M.D., J) (J.S.N.P., J)
29.04.2022
mrr
Index : Yes/No
Speaking order (or) Non-Speaking order
To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer – GDII 100 Feet Road, Ellaipillaichavadi, Puducherry – 605 005.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1287 of 2022
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
mrr
W.A.No.1287 of 2022
29.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!