Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Syndicate Bank vs N. Rajendran
2022 Latest Caselaw 8458 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8458 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2022

Madras High Court
The Syndicate Bank vs N. Rajendran on 22 April, 2022
                                                                             C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 22/4/2022

                                                  CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

                                             C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012
                                                    and
                                               M.P.No.1 of 2012

                The Syndicate Bank
                No.332 Arcot Road
                Kodambakkam
                Chennai 600 024.                           ...       Petitioner

                                                      Vs

                1. N. Rajendran

                2. M/s. Balaji Breeding Research Farms

                3. Dr.M.Ramamurthy

                4. C.S.Ananthalakshmi

                5. R. Pushpa

                6. M. Venkatapathy

                7. Sai Raguram                             ...       Respondents




                1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012


                Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C., to set
                aside the order dated 13/3/2012 made in I.A.No.57 of 2012 in O.S.No.13666 of
                2010 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court V,
                Chennai.



                                   For appellant         ...   M/s.Sampathkumar & Associates
                                                               (No instructions)

                                   For respondents       ...   Mr.S.N.Amarnath
                                                               for R.1

                                                               For R.R.2, 4 to 7 -
                                                               No such persons

                                                              R.3 - died
                                                         -----

                                                     JUDGMENT

The appellant has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, challenging the

award, dated 11/3/2003, passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Tindivanam (Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Tindivanam), made in MCOP No.362 of 1999.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel

appearing for the appellant submitted that parties have taken the bundle.

Appellant has not taken any steps to engage another counsel. The matter pertains

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012

to the year 2011. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence

this Court is of the view that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter

anymore.

3. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-

prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is

closed.

22/4/2022

CMA.No.2772 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012

---

J.NISHA BANU, J.

This matter is listed today under the caption “being mentioned” at the

instance of the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the appellant that some error

had occurred in the order dated 22.04.2022.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012

3. This court perused the order copy and found that there is an error crept in

inadvertently. Taking note of the same, now the order stands corrected and the

corrected order reads as follows:-

“ This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the appellant/7th

defendant in O.S.No.13666 of 2010 as against the order dated

13.03.2012 passed in I.A.No.57/2012 in O.S.No.13666 of 2010.

2. The docket orders in the case bundle would indicate that

there was no representation for the appellant/7th defendant before

this court on many occasions i.e., on 10.12.2019, 03.02.2021,

19.02.2021, 25.02.2021 and 23.03.2021. It has been represented by

the counsel on record that entire case bundle has been returned to

the appellant/Syndicate Bank and reported “no instructions”.

3. It transpires that the appellant/7th defendant has not taken

any steps to engage other counsel to pursue the matter. This CMA is

of the year 2012. The order impugned is dated 13.03.2012 passed

in I.A.No.57 of 2012 in O.S.No.13666 of 2010. Since there is no

representation on behalf of the appellant, this court is of the view

that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter any more.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012

Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-

prosecution. Interim stay stands vacated. No costs. “

4. Registry is directed to issue fresh order copy forthwith.

nvsri 01.07.2022

Note:Issue order copy on or before 06/07/2022.

To

The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court V, Chennai.

J.NISHA BANU, J

mvs.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012

C.M.A.No.2772 of 2012

22/4/2022

01.07.2022(fresh order)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter