Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8434 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2022
C.M.A.Nos.921 & 923 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
C.M.A.Nos.921 and 923 of 2022
M/s.HCL Infosystems Ltd (Unit III)
R.S.No.107/5, 6 & 7, Sedarpet
Pondicherry - 605 111,
Presently known and situated at:
HCL Infosystems Pvt.Ltd.,
No.E4-6, Sector 11,
Noida - 201301, Uttar Pradesh.
... Appellant in both CMAs
Versus
The Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Tax,
Puducherry Commissiontrate,
No.1, Goubert Avenue,
Puducherry - 605 001. ... Respondent in both CMAs
Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 35 (G) of the Central
Excise Act, 1944 against the common order dated 04.06.2018 passed by the
Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal
Bench, Chennai, in Final Order Nos.41725 and 41726 of 2018, in Appeal Nos.
E/42620 and 42621 of 2017.
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.921 & 923 of 2022
For Appellant : Mr.S.Jaikumar in both CMAs
For Respondent : Mrs.R.Hemalatha,
Senior Standing Counsel in both CMAs
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)
These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been filed by the appellant /
assessee, challenging the order dated 04.06.2018 passed by the Customs,
Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench,
Chennai, in Final Order Nos.41725 and 41726 of 2018, in Appeal Nos. E/42620
and 42621 of 2017, by raising the following substantial questions of law:
"(i) Whether the Tribunal is right in denying the Input
Service Credit availed on GTA services in terms of Rule 2(I) of
Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
(ii) Whether the Tribunal correct to reply on the case of
Ultratech Cement Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 117 - Supreme Court of
India] without verifying the fact that the sale are made on FOR
basis. "
Page 2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.921 & 923 of 2022
2. Today, when the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned
counsel appearing for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw
these civil miscellaneous appeals and also made an endorsement to that effect.
3. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned
counsel for the appellant, these civil miscellaneous appeals are dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
(R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.)
21.04.2022
av
Internet : Yes
Index : Yes / No
To
1. The Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,
South Zonal Bench, Chennai
2. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Tax,
Puducherry Commissiontrate,
No.1, Goubert Avenue,
Puducherry - 605 001.
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.921 & 923 of 2022
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
av
C.M.A.Nos.921 and 923 of 2022
21.04.2022
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!