Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8407 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2022
W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 21.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
and
M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009
Shenbagavalli
... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner,
Kovilpatti Municipality,
Kovilpatti.
2.The Chairman,
Kovilpatti Municipality,
Kovilpatti.
3.P.S.A.Rajaguru ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of writ of
certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating
to proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.
9526/2009/C2, dated 07.10.2009 and quash the same as
illegal and further directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to
restore the name of the petitioner in respect of the
assessment of tax in respect of the property in Door No.81
A, 81 B, 87, 88, 89 and 90 in Pillaiyar Koil Street,
Kovilpatti.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil
For Respondent : Mr.Palanivelayutham
No.1
For Respondent : Mr.D.Gandhiraj,
No.2 Special Government Pleader
For Respondent : No representation
No.3
ORDER
This writ petition is filed as against the order passed
by the Commissioner of Kovilpatti Municipality in favour of
the third respondent.
2.The grievance of the petitioner is that when the
issue with regard to the right over the property is pending
in the civil suit, the first respondent transferred the
assessment in the name of the a dead person and two others,
without even providing an opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner.
3.The learned Counsel for the respondent Municipality
submits that the assessment was transferred pursuant to the
judgment and decree dated 24.04.2008 in A.S.No.69 of 207 on
the file of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
4.The petitioner is the fifth defendant in the suit and
as against the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2008,
the petitioner has filed second appeal in S.A(MD)No.864 of
2008.
5.The learned Counsel on either side in the second
appeal are not ready to proceed with the second appeal.
6.Considering that the writ petition is filed in the
year 2009 as against transfer of assessment in favour of
the third respondent made in pursuance of the judgment and
decree of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti in A.S.No.69 of 2007
and the issue is now pending in S.A(MD)No.864 of 2008,
this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the
petitioner to work out his remedy, after the disposal of
second appeal in S.A(MD)No.864 of 2008. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands
closed.
21.04.2022
dsk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
To
1.The Commissioner, Kovilpatti Municipality, Kovilpatti.
2.The Chairman, Kovilpatti Municipality, Kovilpatti.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
dsk
W.P(MD)No.11983 of 2009
21.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!