Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.Selvaraj vs The Principal Accountant ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 7461 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7461 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022

Madras High Court
V.Selvaraj vs The Principal Accountant ... on 8 April, 2022
                                                                           W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED:08.04.2022
                                                      CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM


                                             W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019


                     V.Selvaraj                                                  ... Petitioner

                                                        Vs.


                     The Principal Accountant General(A&E)
                     No.361, Anna Salai,
                     Chennai-600 018.                                        ... Respondent

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
                     issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to record the
                     name of Tmt.Piramila, W/o.V.Selvaraj, petitioner herein in the service
                     register of the petitioner as his nominee.


                                  For Petitioner            : Mr.K.Appadurai
                                  For Respondent            : Mr.P.Gunasekaran




                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019


                                                           ORDER

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

respondent to record the name of Tmt.Piramila, W/o.V.Selvaraj, in the

service register of the petitioner as his nominee.

2.The petitioner is a retired Headmaster and receiving pension. The

petitioner retired on 31.07.2015 on attaining the age of superannuation.

The petitioner himself has stated that he is living with his second wife

Tmt.S.Piramila. However, the petitioner submitted the name of second

wife, instead of the name of his first wife viz., Tmt.Vanapetchi, is a

nominee.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent made a

submission that the second marriage was contracted, during the life time

of the first wife and the first wife is alive. The petitioner has not obtained

any decree of divorce from the competent Court of law. Therefore, the

name of the second wife cannot be entered in the pension records, as the

second marriage is invalid.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019

4.The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court has settled the

principles in the case of R.Rajathi-vs-The Superintendent Engineer

TANGEDCO Ltd., reported in 2018-1-Writ L.R.725, and the relevant

paragraphs are extracted hereunder:

“42. We have discussed the basis on which the various judgments, of course conflicting views, have been rendered. Insofar as the view that the second wife of the Government Servant, who died prior to 02.06.1992 as held in Tamilselvis case, referred to supra, and the view that a widow of an invalid second marriage that had taken place prior to 14.10.1991, as held in Pushpavallis case, have given our reasons, as to why, we are unable to subscribe to the said conclusions of the learned Single Judge. We are, therefore, of the opinion that in order to enable a second wife to claim family pension the marriage should have been valid under the Personal Law applicable to the parties, to hold otherwise would be in violation of the law of the land, viz. the Personal Law of the parties as well as the Criminal Law, which prohibits bigamous marriage.

43. We are, therefore, constrained to conclude that the judgments which conclude that a second wife would be entitled to family pension, irrespective of her marriage being void, under the provisions of their relevant Personal Laws

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019

applicable to the parties do not reflect the correct position of law and therefore will stand overruled. The applicability of Sub Rule 7(a)(i) is confined only to cases where the second marriage is valid under the Personal Law applicable to the parties, only in such cases, widows of such marriages would be entitled to family pension.

44. In view of the foregoing discussion and conclusions, the Writ Appeal fails and dismissed. However, there will be no order as to costs.”

5.In view of the fact that, the second marriage solemnized during

the life time of the first wife is invalid and the claim of the writ petitioner

cannot be considered and therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed.

No costs.

08.04.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ns

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019

To The Principal Accountant General(A&E) No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

Ns

W.P.(MD)No.7894 of 2019

08.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter