Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Kamatchiammal vs The District Collector
2022 Latest Caselaw 6848 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6848 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2022

Madras High Court
P.Kamatchiammal vs The District Collector on 1 April, 2022
                                                                       W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022




                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 01.04.2022

                                                     CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                             W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022


                     P.Kamatchiammal                                     ... Petitioner


                                                       Vs.


                     1.The District Collector,
                        Collectorate,
                        Dindigul District,
                        Dindigul.


                     2.The District Revenue Officer,
                        Collectorate,
                        Dindigul District,
                        Dindigul.


                     3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                        Atthur Taluk,
                        Dindigul District.


                     4.The Tahsildar,


                     1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                       W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

                        Atthur Taluk,
                        Dindigul District.


                     5.The Village Administrative Officer,
                        Ambathurai Village,
                        Atthur Taluk,
                        Dindigul District.


                     6.Murugesan                                         ... Respondents



                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

                     of India for issuance         of Writ of Mandamus, directing         the

                     respondents 2 to 4 to resurvey the lands, rectify the mistake

                     committed by them in F.M.B. as well as patta and further direct the

                     respondents 2 to 4 to grant a separate patta in the petitioner's

                     name to the properties covered under the settlement deed dated

                     25.03.1957 executed by the petitioner's aunty adoptive mother

                     namely one Late.Soundammal vide document No.494/1957 on the

                     file of Sub Registrar, Atthur, Dindigul District in view of decree

                     dated 22.11.1966 in O.S.No.431/1965 on the file of District Munsif

                     of Dindigul.



                                  For Petitioner          : Mr.K.Rajeshwaran


                     2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

                                          For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.D.Sasikumar
                                                                Additional Government Pleader


                                                         ORDER

***********

This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for

a direction to the respondents 2 to 4 to resurvey the lands, rectify

the mistake committed by them in F.M.B. as well as patta, to issue

separate patta in the petitioner's name to the properties covered

under the settlement deed dated 25.03.1957 executed by

Late.Soundammal vide Document No.494/1957, on the file of the

Sub-Registrar, Atthur, Dindigul District and in the light of the

judgment and decree dated 22.11.1966 passed in O.S.No.431/1965,

on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dindigul, based on the

petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2022, within a time frame

to be fixed by this Court.

2.According to the petitioner, the sixth respondent has

encroached upon the petitioner's property referred to supra. The

petitioner claims ownership by virtue of a settlement deed dated

25.03.1957 registered as Document No.494/1957, on the file of the

Sub-Registrar, Atthur, Dindigul District and by virtue of a Civil

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

Court decree dated 22.11.1966 passed in O.S.No.431/1965 on the

file of the District Munsif Court, Dindigul. Since there is a boundary

dispute and the patta for a larger extent has been issued in favour

of the sixth respondent, the petitioner has given her representation

on 06.01.2022, seeking for re-survey of the lands and to rectify the

mistake committed in the FMB as well as the patta and further

requesting for a separate patta in the petitioner's name in respect

of the properties covered under the settlement deed dated

25.03.1957. Since the said representation has not been considered

till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Heard Mr.K.Rajeshwaran, learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioner and Mr.D.Sasikumar, learned Additional Government

Pleader who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5.

4.The petitioner has filed documents along with the writ

petition including the settlement deed dated 25.03.1957 registered

as Document No.494/1957 as well as the copy of the Civil Court

decree passed on 22.11.1966 in O.S.No.431 of 1965 on the file of

the District Munsif Court, Dindigul in support of her claim. The

petitioner claims that the sixth respondent has encroached upon

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

her property and has got a patta in excess of the lands which he is

legally entitled. The petitioner claims that there is a boundary

dispute and only in such circumstances, the petitioner has sought

for re-survey and demarcation of boundaries and for rectification of

the alleged mistake committed in the FMB as well as in the patta.

5.No prejudice would be caused to the fourth respondent if

the petitioner's representation is considered on merits and in

accordance with law after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner

and the sixth respondent as well as any other necessary party

whom the fourth respondent deems fit to enquire.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the fourth

respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated

06.01.2022, requesting for resurvey of the lands, rectification of

the mistake alleged to have been committed in the FMB as well as

patta and for issuance of separate patta in the petitioner's name for

the properties covered under the settlement deed dated 25.03.1957

registered as Document No.494 of 1957 and also in the light of the

Civil Court decree dated 22.11.1966 passed by the District Munsif

Court, Dindigul in O.S.No.431 of 1965 and pass final orders on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

merits and in accordance with law after affording a fair hearing to

the petitioner and the sixth respondent and also any other

necessary party whom the fourth respondent deems fit to enquire

within a period of three [3] months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order. In case, there is a necessity to conduct survey of

the property, the petitioner will have to pay the necessary charges

to the fourth respondent. Any survey shall be done by the fourth

respondent only in the presence of the petitioner and the sixth

respondent and any other necessary party whom the fourth

respondent deems fit to put on notice.

7.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed

of. There shall be no order as to costs.



                                                                                01.04.2022
                     Index          : Yes / No
                     Internet: Yes / No
                     MR





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                             W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022




                     To
                     1.The District Collector,
                        Collectorate,
                        Dindigul District,
                        Dindigul.


                     2.The District Revenue Officer,
                        Collectorate,
                        Dindigul District,
                        Dindigul.


                     3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                        Atthur Taluk,
                        Dindigul District.


                     4.The Tahsildar,
                        Atthur Taluk,
                        Dindigul District.


5.The Village Administrative Officer, Ambathurai Village, Atthur Taluk, Dindigul District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

MR

ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD)No.5909 of 2022

01.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter