Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Durai Selva Leena vs The District Registrar
2021 Latest Caselaw 19600 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19600 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2021

Madras High Court
Durai Selva Leena vs The District Registrar on 23 September, 2021
                                                                                 W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021


                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 23.09.2021

                                                         CORAM

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                               W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021


                Durai Selva Leena                                                   ... Petitioner

                                                            Vs.

                The District Registrar,
                Kanyakumari District.                                         ... Respondent

                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to
                conduct an enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2021 and take
                further action on the petitioner's representation.


                                   For Petitioner      : Mr.D.Saravanan
                                   For Respondent      : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan,
                                                         Counsel for State.


                                                          ORDER

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to conduct an

inquiry on the basis of her representation dated 23.08.2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021

2. The petitioner states that she was married to one Dr.Vineeth.

On account of the alleged illicit relationship of her husband with another

woman, the spouses separated. Her husband executed two settlement deeds in

her favour on 30.09.2014 and 02.05.2015, which were registered as Document

Nos.2907/2014 and 387/2015.

3. Subsequently, the petitioner states that her husband unlawfully

cancelled the said settlement deeds. Therefore, the petitioner filed a suit in

O.S.No.331 of 2015 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.

Such suit was decreed on 30.07.2019. By such judgment and decree, the deeds

of cancellation of the settlement deeds in favour of the petitioner were declared

to be illegal, null and void and not binding on the petitioner herein. In addition,

the defendant was restraining from encumbering the relevant property and

disturbing the plaintiff's possession thereof.

4. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner submitted a representation dated

23.08.2021 to the respondent and seeks action on such basis.

5. Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan, learned counsel for the State, accepts

notice on behalf of the sole respondent. He submits that the respondent may be

directed to consider the petitioner's representation and dispose of the same on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

merits.

W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021

6. The petitioner has enclosed a copy of the judgment and decree

in O.S.No.331 of 2015. As contended by the petitioner, by such judgment and

decree, the deeds of cancellation of the settlement deeds dated 30.09.2014 and

02.05.2015, respectively, were declared to be illegal, null and void by the civil

court. However, it should be noted that the petitioner's husband appears to have

filed an appeal against the said judgment and decree before the Hon'ble

Sub Court, Nagercoil. While it is stated that such appeal was dismissed, the

petitioner has not enclosed a copy of the order of the appellate court. This

aspect should be considered by the respondent in course of inquiry. Needless to

say, the respondent should provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner's

husband and to the parties to documents relating to the relevant property which

may have been executed by the petitioner's husband.

7. Subject to the above observations but without entering findings

on the merits of the dispute, the respondent is directed to consider the

petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2021 and conduct an inquiry on such

basis after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, her husband and

to the parties to the conveyances registered in relation to the relevant

properties. Such inquiry shall be concluded within a period of three (3) months

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021

8. Accordingly, W.P.(MD)No.17093 of 2021 is disposed of on

these terms without any order as to costs.



                                                                                             23.09.2021
                Index              : Yes / No
                Internet           : Yes/ No
                tsg/nsr

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To The District Registrar, Kanyakumari District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

tsg/nsr

W.P(MD)No.17093 of 2021

23.09.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter