Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs N.R.Suresh Babu ... 1St
2021 Latest Caselaw 20275 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20275 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2021

Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs N.R.Suresh Babu ... 1St on 4 October, 2021
                                                                 W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 04.10.2021

                                               CORAM:
                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                                 AND
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

                                  W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021
                                                 and
                        C.M.P(MD)Nos.8320, 8322, 8324, 8326, 8327, 8328, 8329,
                                     8330, 8332 & 8333 of 2021

                     W.P(MD)No.1883 of 2021:-

                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited,
                     Rep. by its Managing Director,
                     Madurai Division,
                     Bye Pass Road,
                     Madurai – 625 010.           ... Appellant/2nd Respondent

                                                       Vs.

                     1.N.R.Suresh Babu             ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner

                     2.The Principal Secretary to Government,
                       Transport Department and Chairman of
                          State Transport Undertakings,
                       Secretariat, Fort St. George,
                       Chennai – 09.               ... 2nd Respondent/1st Respondent


                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                     against the order, dated 26.02.2021 made in W.P(MD)No.3757 of
                     2021 on the file of this Court.


                                   For Appellant             : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah

                                   For R – 2                 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar
                                                               Government Pleader


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/6
                                                                   W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021




                                                COMMON JUDGMENT
                                       (Judgment of the Court was delivered by
                                                M.DURAISWAMY,J.)



                               Challenging the orders passed in W.P(MD)Nos.3757, 3762,

                     3768, 3770, 3774, 3779, 3783, 5956, 7345 and 7346 of 2021, the

                     second respondent in the Writ Petitions has filed the above Writ

                     Appeals.



                               2.The first respondent/writ petitioners filed the Writ Petitions

                     to issue Writs of Mandamus, directing the appellant and the second

                     respondent to pay their surrender leave salary together with

                     interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of retirement

                     till the date of disbursement within a time frame.



                               3.The learned Single Judge, taking into consideration the case

                     of     both   sides,   allowed   the   Writ   Petitions   and   directed   the

                     appellant/second respondent to settle the surrender leave salary in

                     respect of the first respondent-employees together with interest at

                     the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date

                     of actual disbursement. Further, the learned Single Judge directed


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     2/6
                                                                  W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021

                     the appellant/second respondent to disburse the surrender leave

                     salary in six equal monthly installments.



                               4.It cannot be disputed that the first respondent-employees

                     are entitled to get the leave salary to the credit of their accounts.

                     On attaining the superannuation, the first respondent-employees

                     are entitled to get the surrender leave salary for the available

                     number of days. Though the first respondent-employees have

                     retired long back, the appellant/second respondent failed to settle

                     the surrender leave salary standing to their credit till today.



                               5.When the first respondent-employees are entitled to get

                     surrender      leave   salary   on   attaining   the   superannuation,   the

                     appellant should have paid the amounts immediately. Since the

                     payments were not made immediately, the learned Single Judge

                     while allowing the Writ Petitions directed the appellant/second

                     respondent to pay the amounts to them together with interest at

                     the rate of 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date

                     of actual disbursement.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     3/6
                                                               W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021

                               6.Mr.Rajasekar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant

                     submitted       that   the   appellant/Tamil   Nadu   State   Transport

                     Corporation is aggrieved over the award of interest by the learned

                     Single Judge and submitted that the appellant is liable to pay the

                     surrender leave salary to their employees, who are the first

                     respondent herein.



                               7.When the appellant agreed that the first respondent/writ

                     petitioners are entitled to get the surrender leave salary on

                     attaining the superannuation, the non-payment of the surrender

                     leave salary had prejudiced the first respondent/writ petitioners to a

                     greater extent. They are put to monetary loss by the non-payment

                     of the surrender leave salary.



                               8.When the appellant is liable to pay the surrender leave

                     salary on the retirement of their employees, the delay in making

                     payment of the leave salary is solely because of the appellants'

                     inaction. The first respondent/writ petitioners cannot be penalized

                     for the wrong done by the appellant. Hence, the award of 6%

                     interest on the surrender leave salary by the learned Single Judge is

                     perfectly correct. We do not find any ground to interfere with the

                     orders passed by the learned Single Judge. The Writ Appeals are


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     4/6
                                                              W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021

                     devoid of merits and the same are dismissed. However, we make it

                     clear that the reliefs granted by the learned Single Judge in the Writ

                     Petitions are confined only to the first respondent/writ petitioners,

                     who have filed the Writ Petitions. No costs. Consequently, connected

                     Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.




                                                           [M.D.,J]      [K.M.S.,J.]
                                                                  04.10.2021
                     Index         :Yes/No
                     Internet      :Yes/No
                     ps/indu

                     Note :

                     In view of the present lock
                     down owing to COVID-19
                     pandemic, a web copy of the
                     order may be utilized for official
                     purposes, but, ensuring that
                     the copy of the order that is
                     presented is the correct copy,
                     shall be the responsibility of
                     the    advocate     /    litigant
                     concerned.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     5/6
                                                           W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021

                                                                   M.DURAISWAMY,J.

and

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

ps/indu

To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Madurai Division, Bye Pass Road, Madurai – 625 010.

2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department and Chairman of State Transport Undertakings, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 09.

W.A(MD)Nos.1883 to 1892 of 2021

04.10.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter