Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A. Savarimuthu vs The Income Tax Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 22194 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22194 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2021

Madras High Court
A. Savarimuthu vs The Income Tax Officer on 11 November, 2021
                                                                            Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 11.11.2021

                                                        CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
                                                          AND
                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                            Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020
                                                         and
                                                CMP.No.11526 of 2020

                  A. Savarimuthu                                                     ... Appellant

                                                           Vs.

                  The Income Tax Officer,
                  Non-Corporate Ward 12(1),
                  Chennai.                                                          ... Respondent

                            Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,

                  1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench

                  Chennai, dated 22.02.2018 passed in I.T.A.No.1531/Mds/2017.


                                    For Appellant      : Mr. N. Quadir Hoseyn

                                    For Respondent     : Mrs. V. Pushpa,
                                                         Standing Counsel



                  Page 1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020

                                                   JUDGMENT

(Judgment was delivered by R. MAHADEVAN, J.)

This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the appellant / assessee

challenging the order dated 22.02.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate

Tribunal, Bench 'C', Chennai ('the Tribunal', for brevity) in

I.T.A.No.1531/Mds/2017 for the Assessment Year 2013-14.

2.The above appeal was admitted on 15.10.2010 on the following

substantial questions of law:

“1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in denying exemption under Section 54F in respect of investment in a property yielding rental income from shops assessed under the head “Income from House Property” u/s.22?

2.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding, relying on property tax assessment and electricity connection under the head “Commercial” that the subject property was commercial instead of relying on assessment under the Income Tax Act?

Page 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020

3.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in the absence of definition as to the term “residential property”, the tribunal ought to have upheld the appellant entitlement for exemption under section 54F in view of Board's circular dated 28.06.1973.”

3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel

appearing for the appellant / assessee submitted that during the pendency of

this tax case appeal, the assessee has filed the requisite Forms 1 and 2 under

Section 4 (1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, which were

accepted and Form 3 was issued to the assessee on 21.04.2021 by the Income

Tax Department. The learned counsel has also filed a memo dated

11.11.2021 to that effect.

4.The aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the

appellant / assessee has also been fairly conceded by the learned standing

counsel appearing for the respondent / Revenue.

5.This court heard the submissions made by the learned counsel on

either side, as per which, the assessee has already availed the benefit

Page 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020

conferred under the beneficial legislation viz., the Direct Tax Vivad Se

Vishwas Act, 2020, enacted for resolution of disputed tax and for matter

connected therewith or incidental thereto, which came into force with effect

from 17.03.2020; and the declarations submitted by the assessee were also

accepted and Form 3 was also issued to them by the Income Tax Department.

In view of such development, it is unnecessary for this court to decide the

substantial questions of law arisen in this tax case appeal.

6.Therefore, recording the submissions so made by the learned counsel

on either side, this appeal stands disposed of, directing the department to

process the application in accordance with the Act and communicate the

decision to the assessee at the earliest. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 11.11.2021 msr Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No

To

1.Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai "C" Bench,

2.The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 12(1), Chennai.

Page 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020

R. MAHADEVAN, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

msr

Tax Case Appeal No.366 of 2020

11.11.2021

Page 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter