Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6415 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 10.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.S.No. 838 of 2001
G.R. Raju ... Plaintiff
Vs.
1. B. Loganathan
Proprietor,
Shree Siddhi Vinayakar
2. B. Balaji
3. Sony Entertainment Television,
4. Cine Channel & C News
5. Shemaroo Video Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director. ... Defendants
Prayer:
Civil Suit is filed under Section 55 of the Copy Rights Act, 1957 (a) for a
declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the limited copyright
namely the Cable TV rights for a period of 10 years from 11.10.1999 and Pay
TV and Internet rights for a period of 25 years from 16.04.2000 in the picture
PREM PRATHIGNA - Hindi - Colour, starring Mithun Chakravarthy, Madhuri
Dixit, etc. and directed by Bapur for the entire world. (b) for a permanent
injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, assignees or any person
acting on their behalf from exploiting or interfering with the plaintiff's limited
copyrights namely the Cable TV rights and Pay TV and internet rights for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2
entire world in the picture PREM PRATHIGNA - Hindi - Colour, starring
Mithun Chakravarthy, Madhuri Dixit, etc., and directed by Bapu and for costs
of the suit.
For Plaintiff : Mr.C.Ramesh
For D3 to D5 : No Appearance
-----
JUDGMENT
Heard Mr.C.Ramesh, learned counsel for the plaintiff.
2. The suit had been filed under Section 55 and 63 of the Copy Right
Act, 1957, seeking for a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of
the limited copyright namely the Cable TV rights for a period of 10 years from
11.10.1999 and Pay TV and Internet rights for a period of 25 years from
16.04.2000 in the picture PREM PRATHIGNA - Hindi and for permanent
injunction and for costs of the suit.
3. Since there is an assertion of an intellectual property right, the
Commercial Division of this Court will have necessary jurisdiction to examine
the issues raised under Section 2 (1) (c) (xvii) of the Commercial Courts Act,
2015.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
4. The learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted that he had been
instructed by the plaintiff to inform the Court that the relief sought in the
present suit does not survive.
5. In view of the same, the Civil Suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
No order as to costs.
10.03.2021
Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking order : Yes / No msm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
msm
C.S.No. 838 of 2001
10.03.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!