Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Prakash vs The Inspector Of Police
2021 Latest Caselaw 6065 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6065 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2021

Madras High Court
R.Prakash vs The Inspector Of Police on 8 March, 2021
                                                                                  Crl.O.P.No.4365 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                       Dated : 08.03.2021
                                                            Coram
                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
                                                  Crl.O.P.No.4367 of 2021
                                           and Crl.M.P.Nos.2812 & 2813 of 2021
                     1. R.Prakash

                     2. P.vijayalakshmi
                                                                                         ...Petitioners
                                                            Versus
                     1. The Inspector of Police,
                     Shevapet Police Station,
                     Salem.

                     2. D.K.Ravikumar
                                                                                       ...Respondents

                               This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal

                     Procedure Code praying to call for the records in PRC.No.22 of 2019

                     pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila

                     Court, Salem and quash the proceedings.


                                     For Petitioners            :     Mr.S.Jeyakumar

                                     For Respondent             :     Mr.C.Raghavan              R1
                                                                      Government Advocate
                                                                      (Crl. Side)
                                                          ORDER

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.4365 of 2021

This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings initiated by

the respondent against the petitioners under Sections 498(A) and 304(b) of

IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioners are all factual

in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot

decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal

Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioners to raise all the grounds

before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits

and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the

proceedings pending before the Court below.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court to

dispense with the presence of the petitioners. Taking into consideration, the

facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioners are

dispensed with and they shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross

examine the witnesses on the same day, they are examined in Chief. The

petitioners shall be present before the Court below at the time of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.4365 of 2021

questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and at the time of passing of the final

judgment.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. The

Court below is directed to commit the proceedings before the concerned

Court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order. The trial Court shall complete the proceeding in PRC.No.22 of

2019 within a period of four months thereafter. The trial shall be conducted

on a day to day basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1)

MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioners adopt any dilatory tactics, it is open to

the trial Court to insist upon the presence of the petitioners and remand

them to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT 2001

(4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also

closed.

08.03.2021

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P.No.4365 of 2021

rli

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order (or) Non-Speaking Order rli

To

1. The Inspector of Police, Shevapet Police Station, Salem.

2. The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Salem

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.4367 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.Nos.2812 & 2813 of 2021

08.03.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter