Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Project Officer vs The Divisional Engineer
2021 Latest Caselaw 6016 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6016 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2021

Madras High Court
The Project Officer vs The Divisional Engineer on 8 March, 2021
                                                                             A.S.Nos.959, 960 & 962 of 2020

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 08.03.2021

                                                         CORAM

                                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
                                                       and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

                                              A.S.Nos.959, 960 and 962 of 2020

                     The Project Officer,
                     National Highways Authority of India,
                     Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
                     Office of the Project Officer,
                     Project Implementation Unit,
                     No.7, Kamadhenu Nagar,
                     Karur-639 001.                                 ... Appellant in all A.Ss.

                                                            -vs-
                     The Special Tahsildar
                     (Land Acquisition Officer),
                     Byepass Road, Namakkal,
                     now at the office of the
                     Tahsildar, Namakkal.

                     The Divisional Engineer,
                     National Highways, Salem-5.                    ... Respondents 1 & 2 in all A.Ss.

                     Palaniyappan (died)

                     Chellammal
                     Kuppusamy                                ... Respondents 3 and 4 in A.S.No.959/20

                     KaruppaGounder                           ... Respondent No.3 in A.S.No.960/20

                     V.K.Ramasamy                             ... Respondent No.3 in A.S.No.962/20


                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                A.S.Nos.959, 960 & 962 of 2020

                               First Appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act against

                     the judgment and decree made in L.A.O.P.Nos.4, 9 and 5 of 2005, respectively,

                     dated 22.09.2017 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.



                                     For Appellant              : Mr.SU.Srinivasan

                                     For R1                     : Mr.J.Rajagopal,
                                                                Special Government Pleader for R1

                                     For R3 in all A.Ss.
                                     & For R4 in A.S.No.959/20 : Mr.P.K.Shivakumar for R3 & R4

                                                   COMMON JUDGMENT
                                     (Judgment of the Court was pronounced by T.RAJA, J.)

                               First Appeals have been preferred against the judgment and decree

                     passed in L.A.O.P.Nos.4, 9 and 5 of 2005, respectively, dated 22.09.2017, by the

                     learned Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.




                               2. During the pendency of the First Appeals, both the parties, namely, the

                     appellant-Project Officer, National Highways Authority of India, Ministry of

                     Road Transport and Highways, Karur, and the private respondents, namely,

                     land owners, have entered into a compromise and a Joint Compromise Memo

                     dated 28.12.2020 has been filed before the Registry of our High Court on

                     26.02.2021, signed by both the parties.



                     2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               A.S.Nos.959, 960 & 962 of 2020

                               3. Learned Counsel on either side stated that the National Highways

                     Authority of India, the Special Tahsildar and the Land Owners/private

                     respondents herein are agreeing for the terms and conditions mentioned in the

                     Joint Compromise Memo. Consequently, none of the parties/successors/legal

                     heirs, hereinafter will make any further claim in whatsoever manner in any

                     forum on any grounds.




                               4. The appellant/National Highways Authority of India has filed these

                     appeals against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate

                     Judge, Namakkal in        L.A.O.P.Nos.4, 9 and 5 of 2005, respectively, dated

                     22.09.2017, enhancing the compensation from Rs.0.57/- per sq.ft. to Rs.80/- per

                     sq.ft. for the acquired lands of the private respondents, whereas in an appeal

                     filed in A.S.Nos.513 to 527/2015 and 537/2015, a Division Bench of this Court vide

                     judgment dated 22.03.2018 modified the judgment and decree by reducing the

                     compensation per square feet at Rs.67/- instead of Rs.80/- for the same village

                     and the compensation was also paid to the land owners as per the reduced

                     amount of Rs.67/- per sq.ft. Whileso, since the land owners/private respondents

                     in these appeals also have expressed their willingness for accepting

                     compensation fixing at Rs.67/- per sq.ft. instead of Rs.80/- per sq.ft. as ordered by



                     3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 A.S.Nos.959, 960 & 962 of 2020

                     the learned Subordinate Judge, Namakkal, the said offer was accepted by the

                     appellant/National Highways Authority of India.




                               5. In view of the above, the appellant and the land owners/private

                     respondents in these appeals have jointly expressed their willingness and

                     accepted to pay and receive the compensation for the acquired lands in the

                     following manner:

                               (a) A calculating @ Rs.67/- per sq.ft. for the acquired lands of the private

                     respondent + 30% of the Solatium amount + 12% additional amount of the award

                     amount from the date of 4(1) Notification i.e. from 25.10.1993 till the date of

                     pronouncement of award i.e. 05.10.1995; and

                               (b)Respondents/land owners are entitled to receive the Annual interest for

                     the enhanced award amount from 06.10.1995 to 05.10.1996 at the rate of 9% and

                     thereafter {(i.e.) from 6.10.1996} entitled for the interest at the rate of 15% to the

                     said enhanced Award amount less the land value amount already received by

                     the respondent/land owner until the balance land value amount is deposited by

                     the Land Acquisition Officer to the credit of the LAOP. and the remaining part of

                     award passed by the Sub-Court, Namakkal in L.A.O.P.Nos.4, 9 and 5 of 2005,

                     respectively, shall remain unaltered.



                     4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               A.S.Nos.959, 960 & 962 of 2020




                               6. Accordingly, First Appeals are disposed of in terms of the Joint

                     Compromise Memo dated 28.12.2020. Needless to mention that the Compromise

                     Memo shall form part of the decree. This Court grants two weeks time from the

                     date of receipt of a copy of this judgment to the appellant for depositing the

                     entire decreetal amount. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous

                     Petition are closed.




                                                                   (T.R.J.,)         (G.C.S.J.,)

                                                                          08.03.2021

                     rkm




                     To

                     The Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.




                     5/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                      A.S.Nos.959, 960 & 962 of 2020




                                                       T.RAJA, J.

and G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.

rkm

and 962 of 2020

08.03.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter