Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5808 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2021
C.S.No.289 of 2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.S.No.289 of 2002
Varghese Kurian
Proprietor
Appus International Rep by
Power of Attorney Agent
Captain Raju. ... Plaintiff
..Vs..
1.Ajmal Hassan, Proprietor
Arifa Combines.
2.Golden Cine Creations
3.Gemini Industries and Imaging Ltd
Owning Gemini Colour Laboratory. ... Defendants
PRAYER : Plaint filed under and Order IV Rule 1 of the O.S.Rules read
with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C Rules and Sections 55 and 62 of the
Copyright Act, 1957, prayed for a Judgment and Decree:-
(a) For a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the
limited copyright namely the tamil dubbing rights of the Malayalam picture
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.S.No.289 of 2002
Itha Oru Snehagatha starring Thilagan, Nedumudi Venu, etc. and directed by
Captain Raju now titled as THRILL;
(b) For a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their
men, agents, servants or any other acting on their behalf or authorized by
them from infringing the plaintiff's limited copyright namely the tamil
dubbing rights of the Malayalam Picture Itha Oru Snehagatha now titled as
THRILL by producing or releasing the said picture;
(c) for cost of the suit.
For Plaintiff : M/s.C.Ramesh
*******
JUDGMENT
Suit had been filed under Sections 55 and 62 of the Copyrights
Act by the plaintiff seeking a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute
owner of the limited copyright namely the Tamil dubbing rights of the
Malayalam Picture 'Itha Oru Snehagatha' now titled as THRILL and for a
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.289 of 2002
permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing the limited
copyright of the plaintiff.
2. Naturally, since the relief sought is with respect to an assertion
of Intellectual Property right, the Commercial Division of this Court has
jurisdiction to examine the issues raised under Section 2(1)(c)(xvii) of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
3. A perusal of the records reveal that the suit had been filed in the
year 2002 and is pending without any actual progress being made or any
relief granted to the plaintiff. Plaintiff was directed to file an affidavit as to
whether the cause of action still survives. It is obvious that the plaintiff is
not interested to prosecute the suit, since no such affidavit has been filed.
4. In view of these facts, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No order as to costs.
04.03.2021 Index : Yes / No Web : Yes / No rna
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.289 of 2002
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
rna
C.S.No.289 of 2002
04.03.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!