Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5515 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2021
Review Application No.35 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.03.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Review Application No.35 of 2021
S.Manohar Chettiar .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Principal Secretary,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
St.George Fort,
Secretariat, Chennai 9
2.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
Chennai 34
3.The Joint Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
Chennai 34
4.The Fit Person/Executive Officer,
Arulmigu Sidhi Buddhi Vinayagar
and Sundareswarar Temple,
Royapettah, Chennai
5.Dr.K.J.Renuka
6.A.R.Thulasiram Chettiar .. Respondents
__________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Review Application No.35 of 2021
Prayer: Review petition filed under order XLVII Rule 1 read with
Section 114 of CPC, seeking to review the judgment and decree dated
25.09.2020 in W.A.No.758 of 2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Satheesh Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.M.Karthikeyan, Spl.G.P.
For respondents 1 to 3.
ORDER
(made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The review petition is utterly misconceived.
2. By the order impugned dated September 25, 2020, the
remittance of a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as advance towards arrears of
annual contribution and audit fees was reduced to Rs.3,00,000/- upon
counsel for the appellant agreeing to such reduced amount.
3. It will be evident from the first paragraph of the order that the
challenge raised in the appeal was limited to the imposition of the
condition of remittance of Rs.10,00,000/-. If such was the limited
challenge and if the appeal was disposed of upon the appellant
accepting to deposit a reduced amount of Rs.3,00,000/-, there is no
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Review Application No.35 of 2021
scope for there being any error apparent on the face of the order or
any mistaken fact or the discovery of any new material.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the review applicant that an
appeal from the same order is pending. Such submission is irrelevant
in the context of the present review proceedings. Whatever may be
the fate of the other appeal, the order under review does not call for
any interference. Review Application No.35 of 2021 is dismissed. There
will be no order as to costs.
(S.B., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
02.03.2021
Index : yes/no
tar
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Review Application No.35 of 2021
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(tar)
Review Application No.35 of 2021
02.03.2021
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!