Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Principal Chief Conservator ... vs M.Pandian
2021 Latest Caselaw 12785 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12785 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2021

Madras High Court
The Principal Chief Conservator ... vs M.Pandian on 30 June, 2021
                                                                            W.A.No.1480 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 30.06.2021

                                                       CORAM

                       THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                               and
                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

                                                W.A.No.1480 of 2021
                                             and C.M.P.No.9423 of 2021
                                                 (Heard through VC)
                     1. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
                        Panagal Buildings,
                        Chennai - 600 015.

                     2. The Conservator of Forest,
                        Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri.

                     3. The District Forest Officer,
                        Harur Division,
                        Harur, Dharmapuri District.

                     4. The District Employment Officer,
                        Dharmapuri.

                     5. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                        Represented by Secretary to Government,
                        Environment and Forest Department,
                        Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.              ..      Appellants
                                                        Vs.

                     M.Pandian                                         ..    Respondent
                                                         ***

                     Page 1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                W.A.No.1480 of 2021

                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent to allow the
                     Writ Appeal, set aside the order made in W.P.No.7147 of 2008, dated
                     01.04.2019.
                                                       ***
                                 For Appellant    : Mr.R.Neelakandan
                                                    State Government Counsel

                                    For Respondent :     Ms.Priya Ram


                                                       JUDGMENT

[Judgment of Court was delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.]

The Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated 01.04.2019

passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.7147 of 2008.

2. In the said Writ Petition, the learned Single Judge had observed

in paragraph 5 as follows:

"5.In the present case, the question is whether the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of G.O. Ms.No.22 P & A.R. Department dated 28.02.2006. Admittedly, the petitioner has been continuously working in the Forest Department for more than 23 years without any interruption as a Jeep Driver. Since the petitioner has completed

Page 2/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1480 of 2021

more than ten years of service as on 01.01.2006 as prescribed in G.O. Ms. No.22, it is a fit case for regularisation of the service of the petitioner and therefore, this Court finds no impediment to direct the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner. Accordingly, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai, the first respondent herein is hereby directed to send a proposal to the Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest Department, the fifth respondent herein to regularise the service of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the fifth respondent is hereby directed to accept the proposal and regularise the service of the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected M.Ps are closed. No costs".

Aggrieved by the above said order, directing the appellants to regularise the

service of the writ petitioner, the above Writ appeal has been filed by the

State.

Page 3/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1480 of 2021

3. The learned State Government Counsel appearing for the

appellants has produced a copy of the order passed by the First Bench of this

Court in a batch of Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.391 of 2020 etc., dated

13.03.2020, wherein, in paragraphs 7 and 8, it has been held as follows:-

" ...7. We have considered the submissions raised and we find no reason to differ from the view taken by the Division Bench while confirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge, issuing directions for regularization will be given effect to being sub-judice before the Apex Court, we direct that the respondents/petitioners shall be regularized and so far as the date of regularization is concerned, the same will be governed by the outcome of the judgment of the Apex Court.

8. The learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions, states that the respondents/petitioners will be regularized and the regularization orders will be issued within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order. We record this and direct accordingly."

4. Pursuant to the said order passed in W.A.No.391 of 2020 etc.,

dated 13.03.2020, G.O.(Ms).No.8, Environment and Forests (FR.2-II)

Page 4/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1480 of 2021

Department, dated 22.01.2021 was passed implementing the same by

regularizing the service of the writ petitioner therein. The same benefit will

have to be given to the writ petitioner in this case also.

5. In the light of the above said G.O., this Writ appeal is disposed

of on the same terms. The fifth appellant is hereby directed to accept the

proposal and regularize the service of the respondent/writ petitioner, within

a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

                                                                         [P.S.N. J.]     [K.R. J.]
                                                                              30.06.2021
                     Index        : Yes / No
                     Internet     : Yes/No
                     srn
                     To

1. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Chennai - 600 015.

2. The Conservator of Forest, Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri.

Page 5/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1480 of 2021

3. The District Forest Officer, Harur Division, Harur, Dharmapuri District.

4. The District Employment Officer, Dharmapuri.

5. The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

Page 6/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1480 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

srn

W.A.No.1480 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.9423 of 2021

30.06.2021

Page 7/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter