Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12779 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2021
C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
and C.M.P.No.14942 of 2018
1.N.T.Murugan
2.M.Indumathi ... Petitioners
Vs
Duraisamy ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 24.08.2016 in
C.M.A.No.12 of 2016 passed by the learned III Additional District Judge,
Salem reversing the Fair and Decreetal order dated 28.07.2015 in
I.A.No.467 of 2014 in O.S.No.431 of 2014 passed by the Principal Sub
Judge, Salem.
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
For Petitioners : Mr.D.Shivakumaran
For Respondent : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy
**********
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the Judgment and Decree
dated 24.08.2016 in C.M.A.No.12 of 2016 passed by the learned III
Additional District Judge, Salem reversing the Fair and Decreetal order
dated 28.07.2015 in I.A.No.467 of 2014 in O.S.No.431 of 2014 passed by
the Principal Sub Judge, Salem, thereby granted the interim injunction.
2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondent is the 13th
defendant in the suit. The suit filed by the petitioners for declaration of title
declaring that the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.54 of 2007 dated
22.04.2010 as null and void with the prayer of permanent injunction as
against the 13th defendant namely the respondent herein.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
3. The trial Court granted interim injunction and aggrieved by the
same, the respondent preferred an appeal. The I Appellate Court reversed
the same and dismissed the injunction petition. Aggrieved by the same, the
present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.
4. On perusal of the records, the petitioners have purchased the suit
property on 30.04.2008 from the 7th and 8th defendants. The 7th and 8th
defendants gave title over the property by sale deed executed by the other
defendants. The first defendant herein in the present suit filed a suit in
O.S.No.54 of 2007 for declaration declaring the sale deed executed in
favour of the 7th and 8th defendants herein as null and void and the same
has decreed by the Judgment and Decree dated 22.04.2010.
5. According to the respondent herein, after the Judgment and Decree
passed in O.S.No.54 of 2007, he purchased the suit property by the
registered sale deed, dated 17.09.2012, from the defendants 1 to 4 in the
present suit. Thereafter, the 13th defendant was to be in possession and he
constructed the house and his house is also assessed to the property tax. He
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
perused adangal extract and kist receipts before the Court below and marked
as Ex.R1 to Ex.R3.
6. Whereas, the petitioners herein purchased the suit property while
pending the suit in O.S.No.54 of 2007 by the registered sale deed dated
30.04.2008 from the 7th and 8th defendants herein, the petitioners have
produced to prove their possession and enjoyment of the suit property,
Ex.P3 and Ex.P4 namely patta and kist receipts in respect of the suit
property. On the strength of the Ex.P3 and Ex.P4, the trial Court granted
interim injunction.
7. Whereas, the I Appellate Court considered Ex.R1 to Ex.R3 and
also stated that the petitioners purchased the suit properties pending suit.
Therefore, this Court felt that if discussed about the veracity of those
documents which would affect the trial for petitioners as well as the
respondent herein.
8. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the
petitioners as well as the respondent are directed to maintain status-quo in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
respect of the suit property as on today till the disposal of the main suit.
The trial Court is directed to dispose the suit, within a period of six months
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
9. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No order as
to costs.
30.06.2021 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order rna
To
1.The III Additional District Judge, Salem.
2.The Principal Sub Judge, Salem.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,
rna
C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.14942 of 2018
30.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!