Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12195 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2021
S.A.No.380 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
S.A.No.380 of 2016
and
C.M.P.Nos.1044 of 2021 & 6708 of 2016
P.J.Bhaskar,
S/o.Late P.B.Janardhanam ... Appellant
Vs.
Pattuseliar Community, Madras,
Maintained by Pattuseliar Sangam,
Represented by its General Secretary
A.N.Janakiraman, S/o.Nagiah Chetty,
Having office at No.14, Mangamma Lane,
Seven Hills, Chennai – 600 001. ... Respondent
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the
Judgment and Decree dated 13.08.2014 made in A.S.No.41 of 2011 on
the file of the Sub-ordinate Court, Ponneri and confirming the Judgment
and Decree dated 29.10.2010 made in O.S.No.52 of 2001 on the file of
the District Munsif Court, Thiruvottiyur.
For Appellant : Mr.Krishna Ravindran
For Respondent : Mr.P.V.Murlidhar
JUDGMENT
The second appeal has filed by the appellant/defendant against
the Judgment and decree dated 13.08.2014 passed by the learned
_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 1 of 4 S.A.No.380 of 2016
Sub-ordinate Judge, Ponneri in A.S.No.41 of 2011 confirming the
Judgment and decree dated 29.10.2010 passed by the learned District
Munsif, Thiruvottiyur in O.S.No.52 of 2001.
2. The appellant/defendant has filed an affidavit undertaking to
vacate the premises on or before 31.12.2021. To that effect, Paragraph 3
of the affidavit reads as under:-
“3. I submit that the Respondent Society's Counsel has submitted before this Hon'ble Court that the Society proposes to demolish the existing building and reconstruct a new building in the said land. I state that I do not wish to obstruct thus noble cause and I am ready to vacate the premises on or before 31st December 2021. I further submit that the Respondent Society may give priority to the Appellant after construction of the new building, and offer on rent a portion of the building at the prevailing rate of rent offered for members of the community at the relevant time. The Respondent may be directed to withdraw the Execution Petition No.24 of 2017 and all proceedings may be closed in view of the orders passed in the present second appeal.”
3. The learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff has no objection
to the request of the appellant/defendant as in Paragraph 3 of the above
affidavit.
_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 2 of 4 S.A.No.380 of 2016
4. This Second Appeal therefore stands disposed in terms of the
above affidavit. In view of disposal of the above second appeal, there is
no necessity to pass any order in connected miscellaneous petitions. No
costs.
22.06.2021
arb Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
To:
1.The Sub-ordinate Court, Ponneri.
2.The District Munsif Court, Thiruvottiyur.
_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 3 of 4 S.A.No.380 of 2016
C.SARAVANAN, J.
arb
S.A.No.380 of 2016
22.06.2021
_________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Page No 4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!