Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Commissioner Of Animal ... vs Micheal Ammal
2021 Latest Caselaw 12113 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12113 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2021

Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Animal ... vs Micheal Ammal on 22 June, 2021
                                                              W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019

                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 22.06.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                        AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI


                                     W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019
                                                        and
                                   C.M.P.(MD)Nos.4621 of 2020 and 6702 of 2019


                W.A.(MD)No.838 of 2020


                1.The Commissioner of Animal Husbandry Administration,
                   General Office Building (Part-II),
                   Thenampettai, Chennai-6.


                2.The Assistant Director,
                   Animal Husbandry Department,
                   Srivilliputhur,
                   Virudhunagar District.


                3.The Regional Joint Director,
                   Animal Husbandry Department,
                   Virudhunagar.


                4.The District Employment Officer,
                   District Employment Office,
                   Virudhunagar.                                                : Appellants
                                                        Vs.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                1/5
                                                         W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019




                1.Micheal Ammal
                2.T.Rosammal                                               : Respondents



                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent,

                praying to set aside the order dated 28.06.2019, in W.P.(MD)No.4295 of

                2011 and allow this Writ Appeal.



                W.A.(MD)No.760 of 2019
                1.The Chief Secretary to Government,
                   Government of Tamil Nadu,
                   Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.


                2.The District Collector
                   Collectorate, Theni District.                           : Appellants
                                                   Vs.
                1.P.Udhayakumar


                2.The Executive Officer,
                   Kamayakoundanpatti Panchayat Union,
                   Theni District.


                3.K.Mani
                4.P.Sekar                                                  : Respondents



                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent,

                praying to set aside the order dated 07.06.2019, in W.P.(MD)No.7188 of

                2011 and allow this Writ Appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                2/5
                                                               W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019

                                   For Appellants            : Mr.A.K.Manickam
                                   (in both appeals)          Standing Counsel for Government
                                   For R1 (in W.A.(MD)No.838 of 2020)
                                                             : Mr.S.Manohar
                                   For R2 (in W.A.(MD)No.838 of 2020)
                                                             : No Appearance
                                   For R1 (in W.A.(MD)No.760 of 2019)
                                                             : Mr.V.Sasikumar
                                   For R2 (in W.A.(MD)No.760 of 2019)
                                                             : Mr.K.Raju
                                   For R3 (in W.A.(MD)No760 of 2019)
                                                             : Mr.R.Aravind Raj
                                   For R4 (in W.A.(MD)No760 of 2019)
                                                             : Mr.M.Kannan


                                                COMMON JUDGMENT
                                               ***************************
                                     [Common Judgment of the Court was delivered by
                                                 T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]


                                   These appeals filed by the Government are directed against the

                order and observations made by the learned Single Bench in W.P.

                (MD)Nos.4295 and 7188 of 2011, by which certain directions have been

                issued to the Government in the matter of recruitment of last grade

                servants.



                                   2.In our considered view, such observations would not be

                appropriate in a writ petition filed by the first respondent in the writ

                petitions, seeking to quash an order passed by the second respondent

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                3/5
                                                                   W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019

                therein dated 15.05.2008 and 09.02.2011 and to conduct fresh selection.

                The writ petitions were dismissed by the learned Single Bench. Having

                done so, we are of the clear view that directions cannot be issued to the

                Government              to   conduct   selection   in   a   particular   manner,    more

                particularly, when the writ petition was not a public interest litigation and

                the competent authorities to take a policy decision in the matter of

                recruitment were not respondents in these writ petitions. Therefore, all

                observations are directions issued to the Government of Tamil Nadu have

                to be held to be beyond the scope of the lis which was subject matter of

                the writ petitions.



                                   3.Accordingly, the writ appeals are allowed and all the directions

                and observations made in the Writ Petitions are set aside. However, there

                shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous

                petitions are closed.



                                                                    [T.S.S., J.]    &     [S.A.I., J.]
                                                                               22.06.2021
                Index              : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                MR
                Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19
                     pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized
                     for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy
                     of the order that is presented is the correct copy,
                     shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant
                     concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                4/5
                                   W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019




                                                 T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

MR

COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)Nos.838 of 2020 and 760 of 2019

22.06.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter