Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11732 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2021
T.C.A.No733 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 15.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
T.C.A.No733 of 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai. ... Appellant
v.
M/s. Nippo Batteris Co. Ltd.,
Pottipatti Plaza, 4th Floor,
77, N.H. Road,
Chennai – 600 003. ... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
"C" Bench, dated 18.08.2010 in ITA.No.819/Mds/2010 for the
Assessment Year 2000-200.1
Page 1/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
T.C.A.No733 of 2014
For Appellant : Mr. Karthik Ranganathan,
Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr. Venkatnarayanan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M. DURAISWAMY, J.)
We have heard Mr. Karthik Ranganathan, learned Senior Standing
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr. Venkatnarayanan, learned
counsel for the respondent/assessee.
2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 18.08.2010 made in ITA.No.819/Mds/2010 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "C" Bench (for brevity, the
Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2000-2001.
Page 2/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No733 of 2014
3. The above appeal was admitted on the following substantial
questions of law:
“ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in quashing the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax passed u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act?"
4. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the
appellant submits that the above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on
account of the Low Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated
08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said
Circular, the monetary limit for filing or pursuing an appeal before the
High Court has been increased to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that
the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit.
5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax
effect in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular,
Page 3/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No733 of 2014
liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to
restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
[M.D., J.] [R.H., J.]
Index : Yes/No 15.06.2021
Internet : Yes
Rj
To
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai,"C" Bench
Page 4/5 http://www.judis.nic.in T.C.A.No733 of 2014
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and R.HEMALATHA,J
Rj
T.C.A.No733 of 2014
15.06.2021
Page 5/5 http://www.judis.nic.in
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!