Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nanthagopal vs The District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 14944 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14944 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021

Madras High Court
Nanthagopal vs The District Collector on 27 July, 2021
                                                           1

                                   BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   Dated: 27.07.2021

                                                        CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI

                                              Crl.RC(MD)No.349 of 2021

                     Nanthagopal                                : Petitioner/Petitioner/
                                                                 Petitioner
                                                          Vs.
                     1.The District Collector,
                       Dindigul District, Dindigul.

                     2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                       Dindigul, Dindigul District.

                     3.The Assistant Director,
                       Department of Geology and Mines & Minerals,
                       Dindigul District.

                     4.The Tahsildar,
                       Dindigul West Taluk,
                       Dindigul District.

                     5.The State
                       Represented by its
                       The Sub Inspector of Police,
                       Dhadikombu Police Station,
                       Dindigul District.
                       (Crime No.835 of 2020)                   : Respondent/Respondent/
                                                                  Complainant
                                     Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under sections 397 r/w
                     401 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure against the order, dated
                     04.12.2020 made in Crl.MP No.2115 of 2020 on the file of the
                     Principal District Sessions Judge, Dindigul and to release the
                     petitioner's vehicle namely Tipper Lorry TN-81-B-6350.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                            2

                                    For Petitioner           : Mr.Ramakrishnan
                                                               for Mr.G.Sivaraja

                                    For Respondents          : Mr.P.Kottaichamy
                                                              Government Advocate (Crl. side)

                                                     JUDGMENT

This criminal revision is directed against the order, dated

04.12.2020 made in Crl.MP No.2115 of 2020 on the file of the

Principal District Sessions Judge, Dindigul and to release the

petitioner's vehicle namely Tipper Lorry TN-81-B-6350.

2.It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the

alleged vehicle (Tipper Lorry TN-81-B-6350) and his vehicle was

seized on the ground that it was involved in transportation of illegal

sand without any valid permit and in this connection, the 5 th

respondent police registered a case in Crime No.835 of 2020 for

the alleged offence under section 379 of IPC and 21(1) of Mines

and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and

subsequently, the 5th respondent police seized the vehicle and

thereafter, the petitioner filed WP(MD)No.8503 of 2020 before this

court, which was dismissed with a direction to the 5th respondent

Police to produce the vehicle before the jurisdiction Court forthwith

and also directed the petitioner to file an application for interim

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

custody. The petitioner filed Crl.MP No.1113 of 2020 on the file of

the Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul, for interim custody of the

vehicle. The learned Judge, by order, dated 14.10.2020, allowed the

petition and directed the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul to

release the Tipper Lorry TN-81-B-6350 to the petitioner after strict

compliance. Seeking modification of the condition in respect of

depositing the RC Book of the vehicle in question I.e. Tipper Lorry

TN-81-B-6350 to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul,

the petitioner filed Crl.MP No.2115 of 2020 on the file of the

Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul. The said petition was dismissed,

on 04.12.2020 and thereby, the earlier passed in Cr.M.P No.1113 of

2020 has been recalled. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner is

before this court.

3.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on

record.

4.It is the main contention of the petitioner that as per the

conditional order passed in Crl.MP No.1113 of 2020, dated

14.10.2020, he deposed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- before the District

Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust, Dindigul, on 23.10.2020 and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

obtained acknowledgement receipt, on 27.10.2020 and the

conditional order imposed by the court below is onerous.

5.It is seen from the records that the petitioner filed a

petition in Crl.M.P No.1113 of 2020 for return of vehicle. The said

petition was allowed, on 14.10.2020 and subsequently, the

petitioner filed the petition in Crl.MP No. 2115 of 2020 for

modification of the order. But the learned Principal Sessions Judge,

Dindigul dismissed the petition, on 04.12.2020 and also recalled the

earlier order passed in Crl.MP No.1113 of 2020, dated 14.10.2020

as the petitioner obtained the order suppressing the factum of

WP(MD)No.1875 of 2020, dated 30.01.2019.

6.It is also seen from the records that as per the

conditional passed in Crl.MP No.1113 of 2020, dated 14.10.2020,

the petitioner deposed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- before the District

Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust, Dindigul as non-refundable

deposit, on 23.10.2020 and obtained acknowledgement receipt on

27.10.2020. In view of the above circumstances, this court is of the

view that the impugned order, dated 04.12.2020 is liable to be set

aside and the matter is remitted back to the trial court for fresh

disposal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

7.In the result, this Criminal Revision is allowed. The

impugned order, dated 04.12.2020 passed in Crl.MP No.2115 of

2020 by the Principal District Sessions Judge, Dindigul, is set aside.

The matter is remitted back to the Principal Sessions Judge,

Dindigul to dispose of the petition Crl.MP No.2115 of 2020 afresh

purely on merits and in accordance with law, after giving

opportunity to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks

from the date of receipt of this order copy.

27.07.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No er

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

T.KRISHNAVALLI,J

er

To,

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul.

2.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District.

4.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mines & Minerals, Dindigul District.

5.The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

6.The Sub Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

Crl.RC(MD)No.349 of 2021

27.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter