Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14557 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2021
C.M.A. No. 1948 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
and
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
C.M.A.No. 1948 of 2021
and
C.M.P.No. 10500 of 2021
M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Having Office at Municipal Building
Main Road, North Paravur
Regional Office at Dr. Nanjappa Road
Coimbatore. ... Appellant
Vs
1. Vijayalakshmi
2. Minor Aiswarya
3. Minor Sooryah Alagan
4. M.Sajan
5. Manoj
6. K.Krishnaveni
7. K.Sai Ram
8. K.Leela ... Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts
Act, 1984, praying to set aside the award and decree dated 03.11.2018 made in
M.C.O.P. No. 905 of 2011 passed by the Learned Judge, Motor Accidents
Claims Tribunal, V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore and
allow this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
For Appellant : Mr. S.Arun Kumar
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/5
C.M.A. No. 1948 of 2021
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J)
The matter has been heard through "Video Conference".
2. This Appeal has been preferred against the award of the Tribunal
fastening the liability on the Appellant /Insurance Company and awarding a
sum of Rs.28,50,200/- for the death of one Thiru. K.Sai Gopal, aged 36 years,
who was a business man-Civil Engineer earning a sum of Rs.14,180/- per
mensem.
3. In the accident occurred on 02.12.2009, when the victim was traveling
along with his friends in a jeep, he was hit by a Tempo traveler insured with the
Appellant /Insurance Company. Therefore, the claim petition.
4. Heard Mr. S.Arun Kumar, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, and
perused the materials placed on record.
5. Only question is to be decided in this Appeal with regard to the liability.
The Tribunal, based on the evidence of PW2 / eye-witness and an FIR filed
against the driver of the Tempo traveler insured with Appellant /Insurance https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A. No. 1948 of 2021
Company, rightly found that the accident occurred because of the rash and
negligent driving of the driver of the Tempo traveler. However, there is no
contra evidence on behalf of the Appellant /Insurance Company to prove
otherwise contra the PW2 / eye-witness evidence.
6. In those circumstances, there is nothing to interfere with the order passed
by the Tribunal and the Appeal is liable to be dismissed. Arising out of the
same accident, an award has been passed, which was challenged before this
Court in C.M.A. Nos. 2584 and 1724 of 2019 and this Court dismissed those
Appeals and quantum of compensation was also reduced. However, this Court
confirmed the findings regarding the negligence.
7. In view of the above, this Appeal stands dismissed. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
[N.K.K., J.] [T.V.T.S., J.] 20.07.2021 Maya
Index: Yes Internet : Yes Speaking order/Non-speaking order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A. No. 1948 of 2021
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
Maya
To
1. Learned Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.
C.M.A. No. 1948 of 2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A. No. 1948 of 2021
Dated: 20.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!