Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs S.Natarajan
2021 Latest Caselaw 14100 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14100 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs S.Natarajan on 14 July, 2021
                                                                          W.A. No.1457 of 2021 and
                                                                            C.M.P. No.9082 of 2021

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 14.07.2021

                                                       CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                         and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                               W.A. No.1457 of 2021 and
                                                C.M.P. No.9082 of 2021

                   1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary
                     Environment and Forest Department
                     Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
                     having office at Panagal Maaligai
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015

                   3.The District Forest Officer
                     Dindigul District

                   4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                     Office at DMS Compound
                     Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018                              ... Appellants

                                                          vs

                   S.Natarajan                                                 ... Respondent


                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   against the order dated 18.01.2016 made in W.P. No.39734 of 2015.


                                     For Petitioner        :   Mr.R.Neelakandan
                                                               State Government Counsel
                                     For Respondent        :   No Appearance

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                      W.A. No.1457 of 2021 and
                                                                        C.M.P. No.9082 of 2021

                                                    JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

order dated 18.01.2016 made in W.P. No.39734 of 2015. The

appellants herein are the respondents before the writ court and the

respondent herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent, who is the writ petitioner, was appointed as

a temporary plot watcher in the services of the third appellant

department on 01.02.1982 and his services were regularised on

11.08.2004 and he retired on 30.06.2014. As his services were

regularized after 22 years, he prayed for counting of 50% of the

temporary services rendered by him along with his remaining service

for the purpose of calculating the pension and retiral benefits by filing

a writ of mandamus in W.P. No.39734 of 2015. The said writ petition

was allowed, based on the judgment passed in W.A. Nos.27 and 28 of

2012 dated 13.02.2012 followed by the order of the writ court in W.P.

Nos.22540 to 22553 of 2014 dated 21.08.2014 and directed the

respondents 1 to 3 therein to count half of the service rendered by the

writ petitioner as Social Forest Worker/Plot Watcher on daily wages

basis along with regular service rendered by him till the date of

retirement as qualifying service, in a time bound manner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1457 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.9082 of 2021

3. It is also to be noted that the said issue of counting 50% of

the temporary services rendered by a person for computing the

pensionary benefits is no longer res integra in view of the recent

judgment of the Full Bench of this court in the Government of Tamil

Nadu and Ors. vs. R. Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC

4. However the learned Government Pleader representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect vide G.O.(3D) No.52

Environment and Forests (FR2-2) Department dated 21.12.2016.

5. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                      14.07.2021
                   Asr
                   Index            : Yes/No




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.1457 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.9082 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.1457 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.9082 of 2021

14.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter