Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs P.Thandavamoorthy
2021 Latest Caselaw 13969 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13969 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs P.Thandavamoorthy on 13 July, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.3569 of 2019 and
                                                                         C.M.P. No.22912 of 2019

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 13.07.2021

                                                     CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                       and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                             W.A. No.3569 of 2019 and
                                             C.M.P. No.22912 of 2019

                   1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary
                     Environment and Forest Department
                     Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
                     having office at Panagal Maaligai
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015

                   3.The District Forest Officer
                     Vellore

                   4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                     Office at DMS Compound
                     Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018                            ... Appellants

                                                        vs

                   P.Thandavamoorthy                                         ... Respondent


                                                      ****
                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   against the order dated 24.04.2015 made in W.P. No.11935 of 2015.


                                                      ****


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                            W.A. No.3569 of 2019 and
                                                                             C.M.P. No.22912 of 2019



                                       For Petitioner          :   Mr.R.Neelakandan
                                                                   State Government Counsel

                                       For Respondent          :   No Appearance


                                                       JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

order 24.04.2015 made in W.P. No.11935 of 2015. The appellants

herein are the respondents before the writ court and the respondent

herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent, who is the writ petitioner, was appointed as

a temporary plot watcher in the services of the third appellant

department on 01.11.1980 and his services were regularised on

11.04.2003 and he retired on 31.10.2014. As his services were

regularized after 23 years, he prayed for counting of 50% of the

temporary services rendered by him along with his remaining service

for the purpose of calculating the pension and retiral benefits by filing

a writ of mandamus in W.P. No.11935 of 2015. The said writ petition

was allowed, based on the judgment passed in W.A. Nos.27 and 28 of

2012 dated 13.02.2012. The relevant paragraph is extracted

hereunder:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.3569 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.22912 of 2019

" 4. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 to 3 to count half of the service of the petitioner as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis along with his regular service as rendered as Forest Watcher and Forest Guard as qualifying service for the purpose of pension."

3. It is also to be noted that the said issue of counting 50% of

the temporary services rendered by a person for computing the

pensionary benefits is no longer res integra in view of the recent

judgment of the Full Bench of this court in the Government of Tamil

Nadu and Ors. vs. R. Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC

4. However the learned Government Pleader representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect vide G.O.(3D) No.22

Environment and Forests (FR2-2) Department dated 30.05.2016.

5. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                           [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                                 13.07.2021
                   Asr
                   Index               : Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.3569 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.22912 of 2019

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.3569 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.22912 of 2019

13.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter