Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Kannan vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 13907 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13907 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Madras High Court
T.Kannan vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 13 July, 2021
                                                                         W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED: 13.07.2021

                                                  CORAM:

                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
                                                    AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
                                           W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019


                1.T.Kannan
                2.H.Nazar Ahamed                           .. Appellants/3rd parties/3rd parties


                                                     Vs.

                1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
                   170, E.V.R. Periyar Salai, Kilpauk,
                   Chennai – 10.
                2.The Managing Director/Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
                   Dindigul District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd.,
                   Kooturavu Nagar,
                   Trichy Road,
                   Dindigul – 624 005.
                3.The President,
                   Dindigul District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd.,
                   Kooturavu Nagar,
                   Tirunelveli Road,
                   Dindigul – 624 005.            .. Respondents 1 to 3/Respondents 1 to 3
                                                                 /Respondents 1 to 3
                4.S.Kadalkannan
                5.S.Muthuvel
                6.P.Kasilingam

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

                1/6
                                                                               W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

                7.G.Shanmuga Sundaram
                8.A.Manickkaraj
                9.D.Arunkumar
                10.V.Kanimozhi
                11.P.Velmurugan
                12.G.Jeyabalan                               .. Respondents 4 to 11/Petitioners /
                                                                      Writ Petitioners



                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent,

                praying to set aside the order dated 19.09.2018, in W.M.P.(MD) No.1499

                of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.1734 of 2016.



                                   For Appellants            : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja
                                   For Respondent No.1       : Mr.R.Baskaran
                                                              Standing Counsel for Government
                                   For Respondent No.2       : Mr.S.Seenivasagam
                                                              Standing Counsel
                                   For Respondent No.3       : No appearance
                                   For Respondent Nos.4 to 12: Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam


                                                  JUDGMENT

*************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

Heard Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned counsel for the appellants,

Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Standing Counsel for Government, appearing for

respondent No.1, Mr.S.Seenivasagam, learned Standing Counsel for

Respondent No.2 and Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam, learned counsel for

Respondent Nos.4 to 12.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

2.This Writ Appeal is directed against an interim order dated

19.09.2018, in W.M.P.(MD) No.1499 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.1734 of 2016.

3.The appellants though filed a petition to implead themselves in

the said Writ Petition and the impleading petition was also shown in the

cause list dated 19.09.2018, the name of the counsel for the impleading

petitioners was not printed in the cause list. As a result, the impleading

petition is still pending and the interim order granted in W.M.P.(MD) No.

1499 of 2016 has been made absolute. Therefore, the appellants sought

to file the Writ Appeal and the present appeal is very much prosecuted.

In the meantime, the impugned order has been implemented and a

revised seniority list was published on 14.12.2018.

4.We are informed by the learned counsel for the third

respondent society that certain third parties in the Writ Petition

challenged the revised list.

5.We perused the order sheet and find that the Writ Appeal is

neither admitted nor notice was ordered, but adjourned from time to

time. Even today, a feeble request was made by the learned counsel for

the appellants for adjournment. We have rejected the said request for

more than two reasons, namely, by keeping the Writ Appeal pending no

purpose would be served as the impugned order in the Writ Petition has

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

been implemented. That apart, the Writ Petition is pending and the

revised seniority fixed by way of the impugned order has been put to

challenge in separate Writ Petitions and one such Writ Petition is W.P.

(MD) No.39 of 2019.

6.In such circumstances, we dispose of the Writ Appeal, giving

liberty to the appellants to raise all the contentions in the pending Writ

Petition in W.P.(MD) No.1734 of 2016, since the appellants have already

filed impleading petition in W.M.P.(MD) No.4333 of 2016 in the Writ

Petition. In the event, the said petition has not been ordered, the

appellants shall be impleaded as respondent Nos.4 and 5 in the Writ

Petition. However, for some reasons, if the impleading petition was closed

or dismissed, we implead the appellants as respondent Nos.4 and 5 in the

Writ Petition. It is open to the appellants to file counter affidavit in the

said Writ Petition, since the matter is of the year 2016. Registry is

directed to list W.P.(MD) No.1734 of 2016 before the appropriate Hon'ble

Bench during the third week of August, 2021. No costs.

                                                                [T.S.S., J.]   &     [S.A.I., J.]
                                                                          13.07.2021
                Index              : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No
                sj


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/


                                                                   W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, 170, E.V.R. Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 10.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.

AND S.ANANTHI, J.

sj

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD)No.627 of 2019

13.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter