Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13463 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021
W.A.No.876 of 2021 and
C.M.P.No.5119 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL
W.A.No.876 of 2021
and
C.M.P.No.5119 of 2021
(Heard through VC)
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal
Programme Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The District Collector,
Kanniyakumari District,
Nagercoil.
3.The Child Development Project Officer,
Munchirai Block, Puthukkadai Post,
Kanniyakumari District. .. Appellants
vs.
1. J.Sudha Rani
2. S.Bindu
3. D.Nalini
4. T.Sindhu
5. C.Angel Libe .. Respondents
Page 1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.876 of 2021 and
C.M.P.No.5119 of 2021
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to
set aside the order dated 30.06.2011 made in W.P. No.17510 of 2009.
***
For Appellants : Mr.R.Neelakandan
State Government Counsel
For Respondent-1 : Mr.M.Mohanraj
JUDGMENT
(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)
Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court dated
30.06.2011 made in W.P.No.17510 of 2009, which was filed challenging
the proceedings of the third appellant in Na.Ka.No.2277/A1/2008 dated
10.12.2008, having prepared the selection list based on G.O.Ms.No.237
dated 18.08.1984 passed by the first appellant and for a consequential
direction to the third appellant to include the writ petitioner's name in
the selection list of the interview conducted on 12.02.2008 and appoint
the writ petitioner in the post of Anganwadi Organiser.
2. The learned State Government Counsel appearing for the
appellants submitted that the order of the learned Single Judge dated
30.06.2011 has already been complied with vide proceedings of
Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.876 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.5119 of 2021
the second appellant in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.894/A1/2010 dated 10.12.2011.
The writ petitioner/first respondent herein was also joined in the said
post pursuant to this order.
3. As the order passed by the learned Single Judge has already
been complied with, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ appeal.
Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[P.S.N. J.] [S.K. J.]
07.07.2021
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
rsi
Page 3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.876 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.5119 of 2021
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.
and S.KANNAMMAL, J.
rsi
W.A.No.876 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.5119 of 2021
07.07.2021
Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!