Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V. Manikandan @ Mani vs M/S.Minerva Jewells
2021 Latest Caselaw 13395 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13395 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021

Madras High Court
V. Manikandan @ Mani vs M/S.Minerva Jewells on 7 July, 2021
                                                                                   CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED : 07.07.2021

                                                           CORAM:

                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                              CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021 and
                                                Crl.M.P.No. 6668 of 2021

                    V. Manikandan @ Mani                                                   ... Petitioner

                                                               Versus

                    M/s.Minerva Jewells
                    represented by its sole proprietor,
                    G.Suresh                                                            ... Respondent

                           Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
                    Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the order dated
                    23.02.2021 made in C.M.P.No. 3746 of 2020 in S.T.C.No.350 of 2018 on
                    the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No I of Gobichettipalayam,
                    Erode and set aside the same by allowing this Criminal Original Petition.


                                      For Petitioner       :       Mr.J.Ranjithkumar
                                                                -----

                                                               ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the order

dated 23.02.2021 made in C.M.P.No.3746 of 2020 in S.T.C.No. 350 of

2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Gobichettipalayam,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

Erode.

2. The petitioner is the accused and the respondent is the

complainant in S.T.C.No. 350 of 2018. The petitioner has filed three

criminal miscellaneous petitions before the trial Court as follows:-

● To mark documents and to examine defence witness, a petition under Section 254 Cr.P.C., in Crl.M.P.No.3746 of 2020 in S.T.C.No.350 of 2018 was filed.

● To recall the respondent for cross examination, he has filed a petition under Section 311 Cr.P.C., in Crl.M.P.No.3745 of 2020 in S.T.C.No.350 of 2018.

● To examine himself as defence witness, he has filed a petition under Section 315 Cr.P.C., in Crl.M.P.No.3747 of 2020 in S.T.C.No.350 of 2018.

3. After scrutinizing the documents, the trial Court dismissed all the

above three petitions by order dated 23.02.2021, against which the

petitioner has filed the present Criminal Original Petition to set aside the

order made in Crl.M.P.No.3746 of 2020, dated 23.02.2021.

4. On perusal of the orders of the trial Court, it is seen that in this

case, the respondent/complainant was examined in chief on 01.05.2019

and thereafter, his evidence was closed. On 16.05.2019, the petitioner was

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

examined and questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The petitioner was

given time up to 13.06.2019 to file the list of defence side witnesses if any

he proposes to examine. On 13.06.2019, the petitioner failed to appear

before the trial Court and no representation on behalf of the petitioner

side. On 08.07.2019, the petitioner appeared but no petition under Section

254 of Cr.P.C., to examine any defence witness, the defence side witness

was closed. On 27.02.2019, the petitioner filed a petition under Section

311 Cr.P.C., to cross examine the PW1. On 19.08.2019, the petition under

Section 311 Cr.P.C., was allowed. Thereafter, the petitioner failed to cross

examine the respondent and the case was adjourned to 16.12.2019 and on

that day to, no cross examination was done and hence, the cross

examination of the respondent was closed. Later on 19.12.2019, again

another petition under Section 311 Cr.P.C., was filed and it was allowed on

24.08.2020. Thereafter, the case was adjourned for several hearings and

the petitioner was present, but no cross examination was done. Finally on

22.10.2020, the cross examination of the respondent was done in detail

and closed. On 19.11.2020, the petitioner filed a petition to conduct the

proceedings of this case along with two other cases filed by the

respondent/complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

Act, 1881 against other two accused. The trial Court dismissed the same

on 08.12.2020. Thereafter, the respondent's side arguments was heard and

the case was posted to 14.12.2020 for defence side arguments. At this

stage, the above said three petitions came to be filed. Finding that no

proper reason given and the petitions are filed only to protract the

proceedings for one reason or other, the trial Court dismissed the above

three petitions. As against the dismissal of the three petitions, the

petitioner has filed the above Criminal Original Petition to set aside the

order made in Crl.M.P.No.3746 of 2020, dated 23.02.2021.

5. It is seen that the order of the trial Court is self explanatory,

which clearly depicts the conduct of the petitioner in protracting the trial

for one reason or other. The petitioner had sought time to examine the

witnesses namely A.A.Manikandan and A.M.Manikandan as defence

witnesses to depose that they were partners with the petitioner and the

respondent/complainant doing turmeric business and its income and

expense. Further, during the cross examination of the respondent, it was

put forth that the then Sub Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,

Erode conducted enquriy on the complaint of the petitioner on 16.11.2017

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

and the cheques were obtained. The petitioner had also sought to examine

the Branch Manager, City Union Bank Limited, Gobichettipalayam,

Erode, to produce the document on which day, the cheque book pertaining

to the cheque No.000014 was issued; likewise the Branch Manager, HDFC

Bank, Gobichettipalayam, Erode, to produce the statement of account from

01.01.2015 to 14.12.2020; A.A.Manikandan and one A.M.Manikandan.

6. On perusal of the materials, it is seen that the petitioner was

given ample opportunity, the case is pending from the year 2018. The

petitioner is protracting and delaying the cross examination. Finally on

22.10.2020, he had cross examined the respondent. The cross examination

has been done in detail and the defence of the petitioner has been put-

forth, which has been denied by the respondent. Further, the petitioner on

his own conduct has lost his right of examining the defence witnesses.

7. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to set aside the

order dated 23.02.2021 made in Crl.M.P.No.3746 of 2020 in S.T.C.No.

350 of 2018 passed by the trial Court and the same is hereby confirmed.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Though the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

petitioner has not filed any petition to set aside the order dated 23.02.2021

in Crl.M.P.No.3747 of 2020 in S.T.C.No. 350 of 2018 to examine the

petitioner as witness under Section 315 Cr.P.C., this Court in the interest

of justice invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C., considered the same.

8. Considering the petitioner's submission that he is willing to

examine himself as defence witness, this Court permits the petitioner to

examine himself as witness under Section 315 Cr.P.C., and produce the

documents available with him without seeking any further time. This

opportunity is given taking into consideration the statutory presumption is

against the petitioner and now, the petitioner intends to give explanation

and produce documents.

9. It is made clear that the examination of the petitioner under

Section 315 Cr.P.C., is to be done within a period of 15 days from the date

of receipt of a copy of the order or after commencement of the normal

functioning of the Court below whichever is later. No further adjournment

would be given by the trial Court for any reason. The petitioner to make

final submissions, if he so desires.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

10. The trial Court is directed to conclude the proceedings and pass

judgment within a period of two weeks after examination of the petitioner

under Section 315 Cr.P.C. Consequently, the connected Criminal

Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

07.07.2021

msm Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

Office Note: Issue order copy on 29.07.2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

msm To

The Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Gobichettipalayam.

CRL.O.P.No. 11483 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No. 6668 of 2021

07.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter