Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13035 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2021
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
and
C.M.P. No.18916 of 2003
1. Kandareddy
2. Govindan
3. Kullaiyan @ Singaravel ... Appellants
in
S.A. No.1778 of 2003
1. Kandareddy
2. Singaravel
3. Govindan ... Appellants
in
S.A. No.1779 of 2003
versus
1. Pandurangan
2. Venkatesan ... Respondents
in
both S.A.s
Prayer in S.A. No.1778 of 2003 : Second Appeal filed under Section
100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree of the
learned Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri dated 27.08.2003 made in A.S.
No.4 of 2001 reversing that of the learned District Munsif dated
18.01.2000.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
1/4
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
Prayer in S.A. No.1779 of 2003 : Second Appeal filed under Section
100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree of the
learned Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri dated 27.08.2003 made in A.S.
No.5 of 2001 reversing that of the learned District Munsif dated
18.07.2000 made in O.S. No.77 of 1995.
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondents : M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Heard Video Conference)
These matters are listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today.
There is no representation on the side of the appellants in both Second
Appeals. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Even on the last hearing date on 25.06.2021 when the matter was listed
under the caption “for dismissal”, the learned counsel for the appellants
sought time to file his written submissions. Even prior to the last date of
hearing i.e., on 16.04.2021, there was no representation on the side of the
appellants and only thereafter, the matter was posted "for dismissal" on
25.06.2021. The Second Appeals are of the year 2003. No further
indulgence can be shown to the appellants for arguing the Second
Appeals. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellants are not
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
2/4
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
interested to prosecute these Second Appeals. Accordingly, these
Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.07.2021
Index: Yes/No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
vsi2
To
1. The Subordinate Judge,
Dharmapuri.
2. The District Munsif
Dharmapuri.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
3/4
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
S.A. Nos.1778 and 1779 of 2003
02.07.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!