Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs S.Panneerselvam
2021 Latest Caselaw 12913 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12913 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021

Madras High Court
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs S.Panneerselvam on 1 July, 2021
                                                                        W.A. No.196 of 2021 and
                                                                          C.M.P. No.913 of 2021

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 01.07.2021

                                                      CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                                       and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                              W.A. No.196 of 2021 and
                                               C.M.P. No.913 of 2021

                   1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Represented by its Secretary
                     Environment and Forest Department
                     Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

                   2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
                     having office at Panagal Maaligai
                     Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015

                   3.The Assistant Conservator of Forests
                     Forest Protection Squad
                     Vellore - 4

                   4.The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu
                     Office at DMS Compound
                     Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018                          ... Appellants

                                                        vs

                   S.Panneerselvam                                         ... Respondent


                                                       ****
                   Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
                   against the order dated 28.09.2016 made in W.P. No.34055 of 2016.
                                                       ****



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                   Page No.1 of 4
                                                                       W.A. No.196 of 2021 and
                                                                         C.M.P. No.913 of 2021

                                    For Petitioner       :     Mr.C.Jayaprakash
                                                               Government Advocate

                                    For Respondent       :     No Appearance


                                                    JUDGMENT

(delivered by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the writ court

order dated 28.09.2016 made in W.P. No.34055 of 20161. The

appellants herein are the respondents before the writ court and the

respondent herein is the writ petitioner.

2. The respondent, who is the writ petitioner, was appointed as

a temporary plot watcher in the services of the third appellant

department on 16.09.1982 and his services were regularised on

09.09.2005 and was promoted as Forest Guard in February, 2012 and

he retired on 30.04.2015. As his services were regularised after 23

years, he prayed for counting of 50% of the temporary services

rendered by him along with his remaining service for the purpose of

calculating the pension and retiral benefits by filing a writ of

mandamus in W.P. No.34055 of 2016. The said writ petition was

allowed, based on the judgment passed in W.A. Nos.27 and 28 of

2012 dated 11.11.2013. The appellants were directed to consider and

dispose of petitioner's representation based on the orders passed in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.196 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.913 of 2021

the above referred writ appeal in a time bound manner. It is also to be

noted that the said issue of counting 50% of the temporary services

rendered by a person for computing the pensionary benefits is no

longer res integra in view of the recent judgment of the Full Bench of

this court in the Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors. vs. R.

Kaliyamoorthy reported in (2019) 6 CTC 705.

3. However the learned Government Pleader representing the

appellants would state that the order passed by the learned single

Judge was implemented and given effect vide G.O.(3D) No.26

Environment and Forests (FR.2-II) Department dated 21.06.2017. The

learned counsel appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner also

confirms that the order was implemented.

4. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                [P.S.N., J.]  [K.R., J.]
                                                                      01.07.2021
                   Asr
                   Index            : Yes/No


                                                           PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

W.A. No.196 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.913 of 2021

and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

Asr

W.A. No.196 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.913 of 2021

01.07.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter