Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S National Insurance Company ... vs Chelliah
2021 Latest Caselaw 759 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 759 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S National Insurance Company ... vs Chelliah on 11 January, 2021
                                                                       CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED 11.01.2021

                                                     CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

                                          C.M.A(MD)Nos.1236 of 2010
                                                   and
                                          M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2010

                      M/s National Insurance Company Ltd.,
                      Branch Office, 63,Rasi Plaza,
                      S.N.M.R. Building,
                      West Prathatchinam Road, Karur,
                      rep. by its Branch Manager.
                                                                                  .. Appellant

                                                     vs.

                      1.Chelliah
                      2.S.Selvam
                                                                                ...Respondents

                      Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                      Vehicles Act 1988 against the fair and decretal order made in MCOP No.
                      9 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court),
                      Karur, dated 07.08.2007.
                                   For Appellant       : Ms.P.Malini
                                   For Respondents     : Mr.V.Balaji (for R1)
                                                         R2- Exparte




                      1/8


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                       CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

                                                 JUDGMENT

This appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company

questioning the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

(Sub Court), Karur in MCOP No.9 of 2007 dated 07.08.2007.

2.The claim petition was filed by the first respondent herein

seeking compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- on the ground that on 31.05.2006

at 11.00 p.m, he travelled in a motorcycle bearing registration No.TN

-47-M-4457 as pillion rider. It is alleged that the driver applied sudden

brake. In that process, he fell down and sustained fracture and also

injuries. Immediately, he was carried to Karur G.C Hospital, where he

took treatment for 10 days. He also stated that he was aged about 70

years and he was owning 5 Acres land.

3.The claim petition was opposed by the appellant contending that

though the incident had taken place on 31.05.2006, the complaint was

preferred only on 05.06.2006 and it was a false claim. It is also

contended that since the claimant was a senior citizen, aged about 80

http://www.judis.nic.in CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

years, he fell down and sustained injuries, there is no liability to be fixed

on the insurance company.

4.Before the Tribunal, the claimant himself has examined as P.W.1

and examined Dr.Duraisamy as P.W.2 and marked Exs.P.1 to P.12. No

witness was examined and no documents were produced by the

appellant/Insurance Company.

5.The Tribunal, on appreciation of evidence adduced by the

claimant, found that the rider of the two wheeler caused the incident and

awarded compensation of Rs.83,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5%

per annum. Aggrieved over the same, the present appeal has been filed.

6.Mr.P.Malini, learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance

Company would contend that there was no explanation offered by the

claimant for the delay in lodging the First Information Report. She

would further contend that the pillion rider had no coverage and at the

time of accident, no extra premium was paid by the insured and hence,

http://www.judis.nic.in CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

the Tribunal ought to have exonerated the Insurance Company from the

liability.

7.Per contra, Mr.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the claimant justified

the findings of the Tribunal and prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

8.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/insurance company

and the learned counsel for the claimant.

9.In the matter on hand, the first respondent has approached the

Tribunal contending that on 31.05.2006, when he travelled as pillion

rider in a two wheeler, since sudden brake applied, he fell down and

sustained injuries and fracture. In support of his case, he gave evidence

as P.W.1 and also produced Ex.P.1 First Information Report, Ex.P.3

Motor Vehicles Inspector's Report, Ex.P.4 Rough Sketch, Ex.P.5, Charge

Sheet and Ex.P.6 Judgment of the criminal Court. From the oral evidence

of P.W.1 and the documents marked, it is seen that the criminal case has

been registered against the rider of the two wheeler and he has also paid

http://www.judis.nic.in CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

fine before the criminal court. So, the finding of the Tribunal that the

rider of the two wheeler was responsible for the accident does not

warrant any interference by this Court and hence, it is confirmed.

10.It is seen that Ex.P.2 is the wound certificate which shows that

in the accident, the claimant sustained injuries and fractures and P.W.2,

Dr.Duraisamy, who examined the claimant, stated that the claimant

suffered 17½% disability and issued Ex.P.11 Disability Certificate.

Exs.P.7 and P.8 are the prescription and Exs.P.9 and P.10 are the medical

bills. So, based on the evidence of P.W.2 and Exs.P.7 to 12, the Tribunal

has awarded Rs.45,000/- towards medical expenses; Rs.12,000/- towards

loss of income; Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate; Rs.10,000/- for pain

and suffering and Rs.1000/- for extra nourishment. In total, the Tribunal

awarded Rs.83,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum.

In my opinion the amount is reasonable.

11.Though the learned counsel for the appellant would contend

that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation since no

http://www.judis.nic.in CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

extra premium was paid by the insured, admittedly, no document was

produced before the Tribunal. Hence, I find no substance in the

contention of the learned counsel for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is

liable to be dismissed.

12.In that view, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. Since

the appeal is dismissed, the appellant/Insurance Company is directed to

deposit the entire award amount with accrued interest and costs, less the

amount already deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit, the claimant is

permitted to withdraw the award amount, less the amount already

withdrawn, if any, together with proportionate interest and costs. No

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

11.01.2021

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No skn

http://www.judis.nic.in CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub-Court, Karur.

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

http://www.judis.nic.in CMA(MD)No.1236 of 2010

K.KALYANASUNDARAM.,J

skn

JUDGMENT MADE IN

C.M.A(MD)No.1236 of 2010

11.01.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter