Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 675 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021
C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.M.A.No.2557 of 2019
A. Appandai Rajan .. Appellant
Vs.
1.M. Kannan
2.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,
No.45, Moore Street, Chennai 600 001,
Now at,
“Bombay Mutual Building”, 6th Floor,
No.232, N.S.C. Bose Road,
Chennai 600 001. .. Respondents
Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2018, made
in M.C.O.P. No.7901 of 2013, on the file of the Special Sub Judge-I, Small
Causes Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) Chennai.
_____
1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
For Appellant : Mr.K.A.Ravindran
for M/s.A.Shanmugaraj
For Respondents : Mr. J.Chandran (For R2)
JUDGMENT
The matter is heard through "Video Conferencing".
This appeal has been filed for enhancement of compensation granted
by the award dated 01.10.2018, made in M.C.O.P. No.7901 of 2013, on the
file of the Special Sub Judge-I, Small Causes Court, (Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal) Chennai.
2.The appellant-claimant filed M.C.O.P. No.7901 of 2013, on the file
of the Special Sub Judge-I, Small Causes Court, (Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal) Chennai, claiming a sum of Rs.16,00,000/- as compensation for the
injuries sustained by him in the accident that took place on 08.01.2007.
3.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary
evidence, held that the accident occurred only due to rash and negligent
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
driving by driver of the Lorry belonging to the 1st respondent and directed the
2nd respondent, as insurer of the offending vehicle, to pay a sum of
Rs.5,22,750/- as compensation to the appellant.
4.Not being satisfied with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal in the
award dated 01.10.2018, made in M.C.O.P. No.7901 of 2013, the appellant
has come out with the present appeal.
5.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that in the
accident, the appellant suffered grievous injuries. The Tribunal awarded only
meagre amounts for the injuries suffered by the appellant. The appellant has
taken treatment as in-patient in Lifeline Hospital from 08.01.2007 to
24.01.2007, for a period of 17 days and underwent surgery. P.W.2 Doctor and
the Government Peripheral Hospital, KK Nagar, Chennai examined the
appellant and certified that the appellant suffered 60% disability. The
appellant was a Driver at the time of accident and was earning a sum of
Rs.4,000/- per month as salary and Rs.1,500/- per month as collection Batta.
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
The Tribunal erroneously fixed the monthly income of the appellant as
Rs.4,000/-, instead of Rs.5,500/-. The appellant proved the injuries and
disability suffered, by examining P.W.2 Doctor and filed documents. The
Tribunal failed to grant any compensation for loss of earning power
separately. The Tribunal ought to have adopted the multiplier method and
awarded compensation and prayed for enhancement of the compensation.
6.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent-
Insurance Company contended that the appellant failed to prove that he suffered
functional disability and the appellant also failed to prove Ex.P12- salary
certificate by examining author of the same. He has not filed any document with
regard to salary voucher and attendance register. The Tribunal, in the absence of
any evidence, rejected the contention of the appellant that he was earning a sum
of Rs.5,500/- including batta and fixed a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month. The
Tribunal accepted the disability certificate issued by the Government Peripheral
Hospital and P.W.2 Doctor and considering the evidence and documents, held
that the appellant has not suffered any functional disability and appellant has not
proved the same by oral and documentary evidence. The appellant has also not
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
proved by oral and documentary evidence that his future earnings are affected.
Hence, the Tribunal rightly granted compensation by adopting percentage
method. The amounts granted by the Tribunal is excessive and appellant has not
made out any case for enhancement of the compensation and prayed for
dismissal of the appeal.
7.Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the 2nd
respondent-Insurance Company and perused the materials available on record.
8.From the materials on record, it is seen that it is the contention of the
appellant that he suffered injuries and fracture and he has taken treatment as in-
patient in Lifeline Hospital for a period of 17 days. According to the appellant,
he was working as a Driver and was earning a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month as
salary and Rs.1,500/- per month as collection Batta. The appellant marked the
salary certificate as Ex.P12. He has not examined the author of the document. In
the absence of any materials, the Tribunal fixed a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month
as notional income of the appellant. The accident is of the year 2007.
Considering the date of accident and contention of the learned counsel appearing
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
for the appellant, the notional income of the appellant is fixed as Rs.5,500/- per
month, as claimed by the appellant. The appellant has not filed any material to
show that he suffered functional disability. From the discharge summary,
disability certificate and evidence of P.W.2 Doctor, it is seen that nothing is
stated with regard to functional disability or loss of earning capacity as alleged
by the learned counsel for the appellant. In the discharge summary, the appellant
was advised to take some medicines and to take rest for 6 weeks. In the absence
of any material evidence to show that appellant suffered functional disability and
lost income, the appellant is not entitled to compensation towards loss of
earning, by adopting multiplier method. In view of the above materials, the
award of the Tribunal granting compensation by adopting percentage method is
proper and valid and he is not entitled to any enhancement towards disability
and loss of earning power separately. Considering the period of treatment taken
and nature of injuries, the amounts granted by the Tribunal for transportation and
attendant charges are meagre. Hence, the same are enhanced to Rs.7,000/- and
Rs.10,000/- respectively.
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
9.Due to the injuries sustained in the accident, the appellant would not
have worked atleast for a period of six months. Thus, the compensation granted
by the Tribunal towards loss of income is modified to Rs.33,000/- (Rs.5,500/-
x 6 months), at the rate of Rs.5,500/- per month for six months. The Tribunal
failed to award any amount towards loss of amenities and damages to clothes.
Hence, a sum of Rs.10,000/- and Rs.1,000/- are awarded towards loss of
amenities and damages to clothes respectively. The amounts awarded by the
Tribunal under other heads are just and reasonable and hence, the same are
hereby confirmed. Thus, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is
modified as follows:
S. No Description Amount awarded Amount Award by Tribunal awarded by this confirmed or (Rs) Court (Rs) enhanced or granted
1. Disability 1,80,000/- 1,80,000/- Confirmed
2. Pain and suffering 15,000/- 15,000/- Confirmed
3. Extra nourishment 10,000/- 10,000/- Confirmed
4. Transportation 3,000/- 7,000/- Enhanced
5. Damages to clothes - 1,000/- Granted
6. Attendant charges 4,250/- 10,000/- Enhanced
7. Hospital and Medical 2,83,490/- 2,83,490/- Confirmed expenses
8. Loss of earnings 12,000/- 33,000/- Enhanced
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
9. Loss of future prospects 15,000/- 15,000/- Confirmed
10. Loss of amenities - 10,000/- Granted Total 5,22,740/- 5,64,490/- Enhanced by Rs.41,750/-
rounded off to rounded off to 5,22,750/- 5,64,500/-
10.In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the amount awarded
by the Tribunal at Rs.5,22,750/- is enhanced to Rs.5,64,500/- together with
interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of
deposit. The 2nd respondent-Insurance Company is directed to deposit the
award amount, now determined by this Court, along with interest and costs,
within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment, to the credit of M.C.O.P. No.7901 of 2013. On such deposit, the
appellant is permitted to withdraw the award amount, now determined by this
Court, along with interest and costs, after adjusting the amount, if any already
withdrawn, by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal. No costs.
08.01.2021 gsa
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
To
1.The Special Subordinate Judge-I, Small Causes Court, (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Chennai.
2.The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras.
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A. No.2557 of 2019
V.M.VELUMANI, J.,
gsa
C.M.A.No.2557 of 2019
08.01.2021
_____
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!