Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 442 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021
W.A.No.1076 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.A.No.1076 of 2020
G.Meera Rani ... Appellant
Vs.
1.The District Collector
Collectorate Office
Nagapattinam and District.
2.The Tahsildar
Seerkazhi Taluk Office
Nagapattinam District.
3.The Inspector of Police
Thiruvenkadu Police Station
Nagapattinam District.
4.T.Rajendran ... Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against
the order dated 5.3.2020 made in W.P.No.4750 of 2020.
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.1076 of 2020
For Appellant : Mr.P.Vijendran
For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Suresh
1 to 3 Government Advocate
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.)
We heard Mr.P.Vijendran, learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr.K.S.Suresh, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on
behalf of the official respondents.
2. The appellant challenges an order dated 5.3.2020, whereby
the writ petition filed by the appellant was disposed of on the
ground that there is a dispute between private parties over title to
particular lands and in respect of the crops grown and harvested on
such lands. On that basis, the learned Single Judge directed the
parties to work out the remedies before the appropriate Civil Court.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the writ
Court passed an interim order with regard to the crops that were
harvested by specifying that the amounts received should be
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1076 of 2020
informed to the District Court, Nagapattinam. Therefore, he
submits that the writ petition should not have been disposed of in
the manner stated supra.
4. Upon perusal of the impugned order of the writ Court, we
see no reason to interfere, inasmuch as the undisputed position is
that there is a title dispute as between the appellant and the fourth
respondent, including in respect of the crops grown on the disputed
lands. Accordingly, the appropriate forum for resolving this dispute
would be the competent Civil Court.
In the result, W.A.No.1076 of 2020 stands dismissed. No
costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.13167 of 2020 is closed.
(S.B., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
06.01.2021
Index : No
sasi
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1076 of 2020
To
1.The District Collector Collectorate Office Nagapattinam and District.
2.The Tahsildar Seerkazhi Taluk Office Nagapattinam District.
3.The Inspector of Police Thiruvenkadu Police Station Nagapattinam District.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1076 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.1076 of 2020
06.01.2021
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!