Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Janarthanam vs R.Thirumalai
2021 Latest Caselaw 1259 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1259 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2021

Madras High Court
N.Janarthanam vs R.Thirumalai on 20 January, 2021
                                                                                C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 20.01.2021

                                                          CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                                C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015
                                                   and M.P.No.1 of 2015

                     N.Janarthanam                                                    ...Petitioner
                                                              Vs

                     R.Thirumalai                                                     ...Respondent
                     Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
                     of India to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 18.02.2015 made in
                     I.A.No.194 of 2014 in O.S.No.2 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate
                     Judge, Tiruvarur.
                                             For Petitioner        : Mr.B.Ramamoorthy

                                             For Respondent        : Notice served
                                                                     No Appearance

                                                         ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition is arising out of the Judgment and

decree dated 18.02.2015 made in I.A.No.194 of 2014 in O.S.No.2 of 2013

on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruvarur, thereby allowing the petition

filed by the respondent herein to permit him to file additional written

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015

statement.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the

materials available on record. Even though notice was served on the

respondent, name also printed in the cause list, no one has appeared either

by person or through his counsel.

3.The petitioner is the plaintiff and filed a suit for recovery of

money as against the respondent herein. The case of the plaintiff/petitioner

is that the respondent borrowed a sum of Rs.2 lakhs, during the 1st week of

August 2012 and towards the repayment of the said amount, he issued

cheque dated 09.10.2012, drawn on ICICI Bank bearing Cheque

No.102199. On instruction, the petitioner presented the cheque for

collection and the same was returned dis-honoured for the reason that the

account become dormant.

4.The respondent filed written statement stating that the alleged

cheque was lost and the petitioner had knowledge about the loss of cheque.

Even then he presented the same for collection as if the respondent

borrowed a sum of Rs.2 lakhs. After examining P.W's.1 and 2, the

respondent filed a petition in I.A.No.194 of 2014 to receive additional

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015

written statement stating the reason that after taking xerox copy of his

family card, voter id along with cheque bearing No.102199, while

purchasing the two wheeler, he lost all the documents. Immediately he

lodged complaint on 02.07.2012 before the Inspector of Police, Thiruvarur

Town Police Station and the same was also duly informed to the Bank.

5.On perusal of P.W.2 evidence, who is the Manager of ICICI

Bank revealed that he did not even whisper about the communication sent

by the respondent, in respect of loss of the cheque. Further in the additional

written statement it was stated that the cheque was utilized by the petitioner

due to previous enmity, whereas in the 1st written statement, it is stated that

the petitioner and the respondent are known each other and well acquainted

with each other and for the past few months there was misunderstanding

between them. In the 1st written statement there was no whisper about the

lodgment of police complaint as well as the communication to the Banker,

in respect of loss of cheque bearing No.102199. Therefore, the respondent

introduced new plea that too after examining P.W's.1 and 2. It is nothing

but to fill up the lacunae and it is clear abuse of process of law.

6.In view of the above discussion, the order passed in I.A.No.194

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015

of 2014 in O.S.No.2 of 2013 dated 18.02.2015 on the file of the Subordinate

Judge, Thiruvarur, is perverse and illegal.

7.Accordingly, the I.A.No.194 of 2014 in O.S.No.2 of 2013 dated

18.02.2015 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thiruvarur, is set aside and

the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

20.01.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Jer

To The Subordinate Judge, Tiruvarur.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015

Jer

C.R.P.(P.D).No.3687 of 2015

20.01.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter